All News

The absence of a PFS and OS benefit in the transplant arm was consistent across key subgroups in the phase 3 GMMG ReLApsE trial.

In a small cohort of patients with MMS/pMMR CRC, the suvemcitug and envafolimab pharmacokinetic profiles were comparable with prior monotherapy studies.

Pembrolizumab and bevacizumab yielded an ORR of 58.3% vs 12.5% with pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with platinum-resistant nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Pathologic complete response rates with the atezolizumab combination were higher for patients with PD-L1–negative disease in the phase 2 ATHENE trial.

AUTO4 CAR T cells plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide was well tolerated in patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T cell lymphoma.

Daratumumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone for multiple myeloma showed improved 5-year health-related quality of life vs lenalidomide/dexamethasone alone.

Data highlight a need for randomized clinical trials to compare the efficacy and safety of VRD vs VTD in transplant-eligible multiple myeloma.

Data from the phase 3 STARGLO study support the CHMP’s recommendation for approving glofitamab plus gemcitabine/oxaliplatin in relapsed/refractory DLBCL.

Phase 2 study results revealed NP-G2-044 plus standard of care anti–PD-1 therapy indicated treatment exhibited responses across at least 7 cancer types.

Despite prior relapses, 200 mg of linvoseltamab elicited complete responses or better in 49.6% of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Both clinicians and patients should have as much information as possible to participate in shared decision-making for CLL care, says Jacob D. Soumerai, MD.

Phase 2 data support the use of a modified quadruplet regimen omitting dexamethasone after 2 cycles in elderly transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma.

After treatment with an aromatase inhibitor plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor, switching to camizestrant plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor showed a PFS benefit over remaining on the aromatase inhibitor.

The survival benefit of dacomitinib was improved in real-world settings for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC compared with what the ARCHER 1050 trial shows.

Prior data support the ability of PATHOMIQ_PRAD to predict patients at a high risk of biochemical recurrence and metastasis.

The CAN-2409 combination improved survival post-progression vs standard-of-care therapy alone in the phase 2 PaTK02 trial.

Factors such as World Health Organization status appeared to correlate with early mortality in an elderly non–small cell lung cancer cohort.

Next-generation clinical trials may address when to use CDK4/6 inhibition in patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Data from the phase 3 ZIRCON study support the biologics license application for TLX250-CDx in clear cell renal cell carcinoma imaging.

Sequencing different treatments in the first 3 lines of therapy represents a challenge in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, according to Deborah Stephens, DO.

The NRG-GY019 trial will assess chemotherapy plus letrozole vs letrozole alone as a frontline treatment for patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Support for the application comes from the efficacy data reported in the phase 1 ELM-1 and phase 2 ELM-2 trials.

Longer progression-free survival and more enduring responses occurred with avelumab/axitinib vs sunitinib in the phase 3 JAVELIN Renal 101 trial.

Care for brain metastases is constantly evolving, and now, physicians can use targeted systemic therapies as well as more focal radiation to treat them.

Treatment with mobocertinib produces clinically meaningful delays in time to deterioration among patients enrolled on the phase 3 EXCLAIM-2 trial.

Isatuximab plus bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone demonstrated enhanced MRD-negativity rates and a PFS benefit in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Nearly 40% of low-grade serous ovarian cancers have RAS alterations, which are predominately KRAS mutations.

Support for the supplemental biologics license application is based on phase 3 KEYNOTE-689 trial data.

Outcomes observed in the phase 3 EV-302 trial are “transformative” for most patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

There were no new safety signals with cemiplimab plus chemotherapy in the phase 2 EPIC-A trial, Challapalli stated.