Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Provides Survival Benefit Over Fluorouracil Plus Cisplatin in Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Article

Patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma and who were treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin experienced a longer overall survival and improved progression-free survival vs fluorouracil plus cisplatin.

Patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma who received first-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin had longer overall survival (OS) compared with fluorouracil plus cisplatin, according to the results of the phase 3 GEM20110714 study (NCT01528618) published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Investigators determined that gemcitabine plus cisplatin yielded a median OS of 22.1 months (95% CI, 19.2-25.0) compared with 18.6 months (95% CI, 15.4-21.7) for fluorouracil plus cisplatin. The probability of OS was 79.9 at 1 year %, 31.0% at 3 years, and 19.2% at 5 years for gemcitabine plus cisplatin and at 71.8% at 1 year, 20.4% at 3 years, and 7.8% at 5 years for fluorouracil plus cisplatin. The OS was significantly longer in the gemcitabine plus cisplatin arm than the fluorouracil plus cisplatin (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.58-0.90; 2-sided P = .004).

“The GEM20110714 study established the role of first-line [gemcitabine plus cisplatin] for patients with [recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma]. Here, we report the final OS results after an additional 4 years of follow-up, which, to date, is the longest duration of follow-up in [recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma]. The results show that the [gemcitabine plus cisplatin] regimen produces an OS benefit for these patients, with a 28% reduction in the risk of death and an improvement of almost 4 months in median OS,” the study’s investigators wrote.

A total of 362 patients were enrolled on the trial and were randomized 1:1 to receive either gemcitabine plus cisplatin (n = 181) or the fluorouracil plus cisplatin (n = 181). Patients in the experimental cohort received 1 g/m2 of intravenous gemcitabine once daily on days 1 and 8, as well as 80 mg/m2 of cisplatin once daily on day 1. In the control arm, patients were treated with 4 g/m2 of continuous intravenous fluorouracil starting from day 1 and 80 mg/m2 of cisplatin on day 1.

In December of 2020, the duration of follow-up was comparable between the 2 cohorts, including 69.5 months (95% CI, 63.3-75.6) with gemcitabine plus cisplatin and 69.7 months (95% CI, 56.4-83.0) for fluorouracil plus cisplatin. Of this population, 86.7% died (n = 314), including 81.8% (n = 148) of the gemcitabine plus cisplatin arm and 91.7% (n = 166) of the fluorouracil plus cisplatin arm. The restricted mean value time for OS was 33.0 months (95% CI, 29.3-37.2) in the gemcitabine plus cisplatin group and 25.4 months (95% CI, 22.4-28.6) in the fluorouracil plus cisplatin group (P = .003).

After discontinuing treatment, 51.9% (n = 94) of patients in the gemcitabine plus cisplatin group and 55.2% (n = 100) of patients in the fluorouracil plus cisplatin group started a first subsequent systemic therapy. Within this population, 68.1% (n = 64) and 83.0% (n = 83) received a platinum-based combination therapy in both the gemcitabine plus cisplatin and fluorouracil plus cisplatin groups, respectively.

The overall response rate for patients who received a first subsequent treatment in the gemcitabine plus cisplatin arm was 20.2%. Additionally, 44.7% of patients experienced stable disease and 23.4% developed progressive disease. Patients in the fluorouracil plus cisplatin arm who received a first subsequent therapy had a partial response of 17.0%, 52.0% had stable disease, and 20% developed progressive disease. The data for OS were censored at initiation of second-line therapy, with significantly longer OS in the gemcitabine plus cisplatin arm at 29.3 months compared with the fluorouracil plus cisplatin arm at 16.1 months (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.36-0.71; P < .001).

Additionally, a second subsequent therapy was administered to 37.2% (n = 35) of patients in the gemcitabine plus cisplatin arm and 47.0% (n = 47) of patients in the fluorouracil plus cisplatin arm. A total of 42 patients who were assigned to the gemcitabine poststudy treatment arm received fluorouracil, capecitabine, tegafur, or S-1. Moreover, 47 patients in the fluorouracil plus cisplatin arm \ received gemcitabine after discontinuation of study treatment. Ten patients from each arm received immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this group, 30.0% achieved a partial response, 30.0% had stable disease, and 40.0% developed progressive disease.

There were 25 patients in the gemcitabine plus cisplatin arm who survived 5 years or more. By year 5, 4 patients had not progressed, 15 patients had progressed, and 6 patients had been censored for progression-free survival (PFS). In the fluorouracil plus cisplatin arm, there were 10 survivors of 5 years or more, of which 9 had progressed, and 1 was censored for PFS at 11.5 months.

The PFS rates consistently favored gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with fluorouracil plus cisplatin with a similar risk of disease progression or death. The PFS probabilities in the gemcitabine plus cisplatin and fluorouracil plus cisplatin arms was 21.2% (15.5%-27.6%) vs 6.0% (95% CI, 3.1%-10.3%) at 1 year, 8.5% (95% CI, 4.6%-13.9%) vs 1.1% (95% CI, 0.1%-4.8%) at 3 years, and 7.6% (95% CI, 3.9%-12.9%) vs 0% at 5 years (all with P values of < .001).

Reference:

Hong S, Zhang Y, Yu G, et al. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin as first-line therapy for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: final overall survival analysis of GEM20110714 phase III study. J Clin Oncol. Published Online August 11, 2021. doi:10.1200/JCO.21.00396

Recent Videos
Treatment with toripalimab does not yield the same vascular toxicity seen with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma, according to Barbara Burtness, MD.
Overall survival also appears to improve with toripalimab compared with chemotherapy among patients with metastatic or advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
head and neck cancer
head and neck cancer
head and neck cancer
Related Content