Axitinib Fails to Meet Primary Endpoint in Treatment-Naive RCC

Article

In mid-October, Pfizer announced that its phase III study being conducted examining axitinib (Inlyta) in treatment-naive patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma failed to meet its primary endpoint of improving progression-free survival compared with sorafenib.

In mid-October, Pfizer announced that its phase III study being conducted examining axitinib (Inlyta) in treatment-naive patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma failed to meet its primary endpoint of improving progression-free survival compared with sorafenib.

The results were from the AGILE 1051 trial, which included 280 treatment-naive patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. The trial was powered to show a 78% improvement in progression-free survival benefit with axitinib compared with sorafenib.

The announcement, published on Pfizer Pharmaceutical News and Media, said that “a preliminary review of the data showed that overall the median progression-free survival for [axitinib] exceeded the median progression-free survival for sorafenib, but did not meet statistical significance.”

However, a pre-specified subgroup analysis of patients classified as having good performance status showed that axitinib exceeded the median progression-free survival for sorafenib.

“We are analyzing the study findings to determine whether further evaluation of [axitinib] in specific subpopulations of treatment-naive patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma would be warranted,” Mace Rothenberg, MD, senior vice president of clinical development and medical affairs for Pfizer’s Oncology Business Unit, said in a press release.

In January, axitinib was approved by the FDA for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma after failure of one prior systemic therapy. At that time, it became the seventh drug approved for renal cancer in 7 years.

At the 2012 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) held in June, Brian I. Rini, MD, of Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, presented results of a phase II retrospective trial that also examined the effects of axitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer who had not been previously treated in a metastatic setting. The results showed that patients who achieved high drug exposure to axitinib had a longer progression-free survival and greater response rate compared with those who did not receive a titrated dose of the drug. 

When asked about the implications of the announcement about Pfizer’s trial, Rini said that it is “too early to say because we do not have any details on the trial.”

“Pending the final results of both trials, we will try to make an assessment of the drug and see if it has any value in these patients,” Rini said. “It is hard to say right now though.”

Dr. Rini has done consulting work and received research funding from Pfizer.

Recent Videos
Various kidney cancer trials have combined agents such as A2a receptor inhibitors with immunotherapy backbones to potentially improve treatment outcomes.
Leveraging novel agents, innovative clinical trial designs, and correlative studies may improve the treatment of patients with kidney cancer.
An “avalanche of funding” has propelled the kidney cancer field forward, says Jason Muhitch, PhD.
Kidney cancer advocacy efforts have spread the urgency and importance of funding research in the field to members of Congress.
Advocacy efforts have yielded a dramatic increase in kidney cancer research, according to Elizabeth P. Henske, MD.
A review of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma shows radiological tumor burden as an independent prognostic factor for survival.
A phase 2 trial is assessing ubamatamab in patients with MUC16-expressing SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma and epithelioid sarcoma.
Analysis of 2 phase 1 trials compared gut biome diversity between standard of care with or without CBM588 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
Related Content