18 Vepdegestrant, a PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC) Estrogen Receptor (ER) Degrader, Plus Palbociclib in ER-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)–Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Phase 1b Cohort

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement41st Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 38
Issue 4
Pages: 21-22

18 Vepdegestrant, a PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC) Estrogen Receptor (ER) Degrader, Plus Palbociclib in ER-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)–Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Phase 1b Cohort

18 Vepdegestrant, a PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC) Estrogen Receptor (ER) Degrader, Plus Palbociclib in ER-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)–Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Phase 1b Cohort

Background

Vepdegestrant (ARV-471) is an oral proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTAC) estrogen receptor (ER) degrader. In a phase 1/2 study (NCT04072952), vepdegestrant monotherapy had a favorable safety profile and encouraging clinical activity with robust ER degradation. The phase 1b cohort of this study is evaluating vepdegestrant plus the CDK4/6
inhibitor palbociclib.

Methods

Eligible patients had estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/HER2-negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer and had received 1 or more prior endocrine therapies and less than 2 chemotherapy regimens for advanced disease; prior CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment was permitted. Vepdegestrant was given orally once daily continuously at doses of 180 mg (n = 2), 200 mg (n = 21), 400 mg (n = 3), or 500 mg (n = 20); palbociclib 125 mg was given orally once daily for 21 days followed by 7 days off treatment in 28-day cycles. Primary end points were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the first cycle and safety.

Results

As of June 6, 2023, 46 patients were enrolled (female, 97.8%; median age, 62.0 years [range, 29-78]). Patients had received a median of 4 prior therapies (1-11) in any setting (CDK4/6 inhibitors, 87.0%; fulvestrant, 80.4%; chemotherapy, 76.1% [45.7% in metastatic setting]). There were no DLTs. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to dose reductions or discontinuation of vepdegestrant occurred in 5 and 4 patients, respectively. TEAEs leading to dose reductions or discontinuation of palbociclib occurred in 34 and 8 patients, respectively. Grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) to either treatment in 10% of patients or more were neutropenia (89.1%), decreased white blood cell count (15.2%), and decreased platelet count (10.9%); no grade 5 TRAEs or febrile neutropenia occurred. The clinical benefit rate (rate of confirmed complete response, partial response, or stable disease at 24 weeks or more) with vepdegestrant plus palbociclib was 63.0% (95% CI, 47.5-76.8). Objective response rate in patients with measurable disease at baseline (n = 31) was 41.9% (95% CI, 24.5-60.9). Pharmacokinetics showed dose-dependent exposure for vepdegestrant; palbociclib exposure was similar across dose levels of vepdegestrant and modestly higher compared with historical data. Substantial, sustained decreases in mutant ESR1 circulating tumor DNA levels were observed.

Conclusion

Vepdegestrant plus palbociclib showed promising clinical activity in patients with heavily pretreated ER+/HER2– advanced breast cancer. The safety profile of vepdegestrant plus palbociclib was generally consistent with the known safety profiles except for increased grade 3/4 neutropenia (managed with monitoring and palbociclib dose reductions).

Articles in this issue

1 Centrally Located Breast Cancer Is More Aggressive in Bahraini Patients
1 Centrally Located Breast Cancer Is More Aggressive in Bahraini Patients
2 Is Laterality in Breast Cancer Still Worth Studying? Local Experience in Bahrain
2 Is Laterality in Breast Cancer Still Worth Studying? Local Experience in Bahrain
3 Gender Disparities in the  National Institutes of Health  Funding for Breast Cancer
3 Gender Disparities in the National Institutes of Health Funding for Breast Cancer
4 Bacopaside: Exploring Its Potential in Addressing Chemoresistance and Modulating Doxorubicin Accumulation in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells
4 Bacopaside: Exploring Its Potential in Addressing Chemoresistance and Modulating Doxorubicin Accumulation in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells
5 Predictors of Axillary Complete Pathologic Response in Hormone Receptor–Positive, HER2-Negative, Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer
5 Predictors of Axillary Complete Pathologic Response in Hormone Receptor–Positive, HER2-Negative, Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer
6 Treatment Outcomes of the KEYNOTE-522 Regimen in an Ethnically Diverse Patient Population
6 Treatment Outcomes of the KEYNOTE-522 Regimen in an Ethnically Diverse Patient Population
7 Real-World Efficacy and Adverse Events of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Experience
7 Real-World Efficacy and Adverse Events of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Experience
8 Using a Liquid Biopsy Mediated Approach for Determination of HER2 Amplification Status in Patient Samples
8 Using a Liquid Biopsy Mediated Approach for Determination of HER2 Amplification Status in Patient Samples
9 Elacestrant (ELA) vs Standard-of-Care (SOC) in ER+/HER2–Advanced (adv) or Metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC) with ESR1 Mutation (ESR1-mut): Key Biomarkers and Clinical Subgroup Analyses From the Phase 3 EMERALD Trial
9 Elacestrant (ELA) vs Standard-of-Care (SOC) in ER+/HER2–Advanced (adv) or Metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC) with ESR1 Mutation (ESR1-mut): Key Biomarkers and Clinical Subgroup Analyses From the Phase 3 EMERALD Trial
10 Real-World Effectiveness of Palbociclib (PAL) Plus Aromatase Inhibitors (AI) in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) and Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD)
10 Real-World Effectiveness of Palbociclib (PAL) Plus Aromatase Inhibitors (AI) in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) and Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD)
11 Phase 3 Study of Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy, Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Endocrine Therapy for Early-Stage High-Risk ER+/HER2– Breast Cancer: KEYNOTE-756
11 Phase 3 Study of Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy, Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Endocrine Therapy for Early-Stage High-Risk ER+/HER2– Breast Cancer: KEYNOTE-756
12 EMERALD Trial Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Patients (pts) With ER+/HER2- Advanced or Metastatic Breast  Cancer (mBC) Comparing Oral Elacestrant vs Standard-of-Care (SoC) Endocrine Therapy
12 EMERALD Trial Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Patients (pts) With ER+/HER2- Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC) Comparing Oral Elacestrant vs Standard-of-Care (SoC) Endocrine Therapy
13 The Cause and Eradication of Breast Cancer
13 The Cause and Eradication of Breast Cancer
14 Outcomes With First-Line (1L) Ribociclib (RIB) + Endocrine Therapy (ET) vs Physician’s Choice Combination Chemotherapy (combo CT) by Age in Pre/Perimenopausal Patients (pts) With Aggressive HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC): A Subgroup Analysis of the RIGHT Choice Trial
14 Outcomes With First-Line (1L) Ribociclib (RIB) + Endocrine Therapy (ET) vs Physician’s Choice Combination Chemotherapy (combo CT) by Age in Pre/Perimenopausal Patients (pts) With Aggressive HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC): A Subgroup Analysis of the RIGHT Choice Trial
15 Concurrent Use of Abemaciclib and Radiation Therapy (RT) Among Patients With HR+, HER2– Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC): Real-World Utilization and Safety
15 Concurrent Use of Abemaciclib and Radiation Therapy (RT) Among Patients With HR+, HER2– Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC): Real-World Utilization and Safety
Recent Videos
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Heather Zinkin, MD, states that reflexology improved pain from chemotherapy-induced neuropathy in patients undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer.
Study findings reveal that patients with breast cancer reported overall improvement in their experience when receiving reflexology plus radiotherapy.
Patients undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer were offered 15-minute nurse-led reflexology sessions to increase energy and reduce stress and pain.
Whole or accelerated partial breast ultra-hypofractionated radiation in older patients with early breast cancer may reduce recurrence with low toxicity.
Ultra-hypofractionated radiation in those 65 years or older with early breast cancer yielded no ipsilateral recurrence after a 10-month follow-up.
The unclear role of hypofractionated radiation in older patients with early breast cancer in prior trials incentivized research for this group.
Related Content