Adagrasib Combo Yields Promising Preliminary Activity in KRAS G12C+ NSCLC

News
Article

Data from the phase 2 KRYSTAL-7 study support a phase 3 trial assessing concurrent adagrasib plus pembrolizumab compared with pembrolizumab alone in treatment-naïve KRAS G12C-mutated non–small cell lung cancer.

"With longer follow-up, concurrent adagrasib and [pembrolizumab] demonstrated encouraging preliminary activity in patients with PD-L1 greater than 50% and a manageable safety profile," according to Marina Garassino, MD.

"With longer follow-up, concurrent adagrasib and [pembrolizumab] demonstrated encouraging preliminary activity in patients with PD-L1 greater than 50% and a manageable safety profile," according to Marina Garassino, MD.

Investigators reported that adagrasib (Krazati) plus pembrolizumab (Keytruda) demonstrated promise as a treatment for patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring KRAS G12C mutations, according to findings from the phase 2 KRYSTAL-7 trial (NCT04613596) presented at the 2023 European Society for Medical Oncology Congress (ESMO).1,2

“With longer follow-up, concurrent adagrasib and [pembrolizumab] demonstrated encouraging preliminary activity in patients with PD-L1 greater than 50% and a manageable safety profile,” Marina Garassino, MD, professor of hematology and oncology at the University of Chicago, and one of the study’s investigators, said of the mid-stage data presented at the ESMO Congress 2023.

In patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥50%, adagrasib and pembrolizumab showed an overall response rate (ORR) of 63% (32/51; 95% CI, 48-76) and a disease control rate (DCR) of 84% (43/51; 95% CI, 12.6-not evaluable [NE]). The ORR seen with the combination compares favorably with the ORR of pembrolizumab of 39%-45% when used as a single-agent.

Safety Considerations

The safety profile of the combination of adagrasib and pembrolizumab was consistent with the known safety profiles of either agent as a monotherapy. Among the 148 patients, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) led to permanent adagrasib discontinuation in 6% of patients (n = 9), and 11% (n = 16) of patients discontinued pembrolizumab due to TRAEs. Only 4% (n = 6) of patients discontinued both drugs due to TRAEs. Dose reductions due to TRAEs occurred in 46% (n = 66) of patients, and 59% (n = 88) temporarily discontinued treatment due to TRAEs.

Nausea and diarrhea were the most common TRAEs, occurring at any grade in 51 and 44 patients, respectively. Immune-related TRAEs of any grade occurred in 18% (n = 26) of patients, and immune-related TRAEs grade 3 or higher occurred in 5% (n = 8) of patients. There were 2 grade 5 TRAEs of pneumonitis and pneumonia.

Hepatic Safety

“Sotorasib has already shown a severe hepatotoxicity when combined in the first-line with immune checkpoint inhibitors in treatment of [patients with treatment-naïve NSCLC] and also when it was administered sequentially following a prior immune checkpoint inhibitor, in particular, within 30 days,” Garassino said in her presentation.

However, adagrasib does not share the same hepatotoxicity concerns, potentially due to its steady-state pharmacokinetics (PK) and low peak-to-trough ratio. The administration of adagrasib sequentially or in combination with pembrolizumab is not limited by hepatotoxicity.

In the KRYSTAL-7 trial, treatment-related hepatic events occurred in less than 10% of patients. Alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) increases were observed in 38 and 32 patients, respectively, but no patient discontinued both adagrasib and pembrolizumab due to an increase in ALT/AST or hepatic TRAEs.

Moreover, hepatic TRAEs, particularly ALT/AST increases, were resolved favorably. The median time to first resolution of increase ALT/AST was 22 days, and resolution occurred in about 80% of cases.

KRYSTAL-7 Trial

KRYSTAL-7’s phase 2 primary end point is ORR to establish the efficacy of adagrasib monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab administered to patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. The phase 2 secondary end points are safety, tolerability, duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and PK.

The trial consists of 3 cohorts. Cohort 1a includes patients with a PD-L1 TPS <1% who received adagrasib 400 mg twice daily in combination with pembrolizumab. Cohort 1b had a PD-L1 TPS <1% and received adagrasib monotherapy 600 mg twice daily. Cohort 2 had a PD-L1 TPS ≥1% and received adagrasib 400 mg twice daily with pembrolizumab.

The median follow-up was 8.7 months for all patients and 10.1 months for patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥50%. The median time to response was 1.4 months, and a median PFS was not reached (95% CI, 8.2-NE).

Patients were eligible for phase 2 if they had a histologically confirmed diagnosis of unresectable or metastatic NSCLC with a KRAS G12C mutation and any PD-L1 TPS.3

Future of KRYSTAL-7

“These findings support the initiation of a phase 3 trial evaluating concurrent adagrasib and [pembrolizumab] vs [pembrolizumab] in treatment naïve KRAS G12C,” Garassino said in her presentation.

The phase 3 KRYSTAL-7 trial plans to begin enrollment at the end of this year.1 The phase 3 primary end point is PFS, and the secondary end points are safety, tolerability, PK, health-related quality-of-life, overall survival, and DoR.

References

  1. Garassino MC, Theelan WSME, Jotte R, et al. KRYSTAL-7: Efficacy and safety of adagrasib with pembrolizumab in patients with treatment-naïve, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring a KRASG12C mutation. Presented at: European Society for Medical Oncology Congress 2023; October 20-24, 2023; Madrid, Spain. Abstract LBA65.
  2. Mirati presents late-breaking results evaluating the combination of adagrasib and pembrolizumab in first-line non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). News release. Mirati. October 17, 2023. Accessed October 20, 2023.
Recent Videos
The 2 main pafolacianine components, a folate analog and a dye, are commonly used in other medical applications.
An intravenous infusion administered prior to surgery enables treatment to occur in a normal time frame without the need for additional procedural time.
STX-478 showed efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors regardless of whether they had kinase domain or helical PI3K mutations.
STX-478 may avoid adverse effects associated with prior PI3K inhibitors that lack selectivity for the mutated protein vs the wild-type protein.
Phase 1 data may show the possibility of rationally designing agents that can preferentially target PI3K mutations in solid tumors.
Patrick Oh, MD, highlights next steps for further research in treating patients with systemic therapy in addition to radiotherapy for early-stage NSCLC.
Increased use of systemic therapies, particularly among patients with high-risk node-negative NSCLC, were observed following radiotherapy.
Interest in novel therapies to improve outcomes initiated an investigation of the use of immunotherapy in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.
Patients with HR-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer and high-risk features may derive benefit from ovarian function suppression plus endocrine therapy.
Paolo Tarantino, MD discusses updated breast cancer trial findings presented at ESMO 2024 supporting the use of agents such as T-DXd and ribociclib.
Related Content