Adjuvant Capecitabine Bests Bolus 5-FU/LV in Patients With Dukes’ C Colon Cancer

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 14 No 8
Volume 14
Issue 8

ORLANDO-At a median follow-up of 51 months, data reported atASCO from the X-ACT phase III trial

ORLANDO-At a median follow-up of 51 months, data reported atASCO from the X-ACT phase III trialof capecitabine (Xeloda) vs bolus fluorouracil(5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) asadjuvant therapy for patients withDukes' C colon cancer confirm thatadjuvant capecitabine showed consistentbenefits over bolus 5-FU/LV, withat least equivalent disease-free survival(DFS) and a better safety profile,Christopher Twelves, MD, said (abstract3521)."The superior efficacy of capecitabineover 5-FU/LV in metastatic disease(response rate) has translated intosuperior efficacy in the adjuvant setting(relapse-free survival). These findingsprovide a very clear rationale forreplacing 5-FU/LV with capecitabinein the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer,"Dr. Twelves said.The X-ACT trial was undertaken toevaluate the efficacy of capecitabine vs5-FU/LV after studies showed superioractivity and improved safety fororal capecitabine compared with bolus5-FU/LV in first-line metastaticcolorectal cancer. The open-label, multinational,randomized, parallel-groupstudy enrolled 1,987 patients with resectedDukes' C colon carcinoma. Patientswere randomized to receive eitheroral capecitabine (1,250 mg/m2twice daily on days 1-14, every 3 weeks)or IV 5-FU/LV (Mayo Clinic regimen:LV-20 mg/m2 + 5-FU-425 mg/m2 ondays 1-5, every 4 weeks) for 24 weeks.Equivalent DFS, Better RFSThe primary study endpoint was atleast equivalence in DFS. Dr. Twelvessaid that the intent-to-treat analysisshowed at least equivalence in terms ofDFS between the treatment arms, witha strong trend toward superior DFSfor capecitabine (hazard ratio [HR] =0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI],0.75-1.00; P =.0525). At a median follow-up of 53 months, reported followingASCO, 3-year DFS was 66%with capecitabine vs 62.9% with 5-FU/LV (hazard ratio 0.87; P = .055).Relapse-free survival was significantlybetter for capecitabine. The HRof 0.89 translates into a significant14% reduction in risk of relapse withcapecitabine. Capecitabine causedsignificantly (P < .001) less all-gradediarrhea, nausea/vomiting, stomatitis,alopecia, and neutropenia and lessgrade 3/4 neutropenia, stomatitis,and neutropenic fever/sepsis than5-FU/LV. Capecitabine caused morenonlife-threatening hand-foot syndromeand hyperbilirubinemia than5-FU/LV (P < .001).Dr. Twelves concluded, "Multivariateanalysis showed that capecitabinetreatment has a significant impact onDFS (P = .015). The improved safetyprofile of capecitabine in the adjuvantsetting mirrors that observed in themetastatic setting. The high efficacy,improved safety, and convenience ofcapecitabine may increase the proportionof patients able and/or willingto benefit from adjuvant treatment."Adjuvant Xeloda ReceivesFDA ApprovalSince ASCO, the U.S. Food andDrug Administration (FDA) has approvedXeloda for use as single-agentadjuvant therapy following completeresection of the primary tumor forpatients with Dukes' C colon cancerwhen treatment with fluoropyrimidinetherapy alone is preferred. Approvalwas granted after review of datafrom the X-ACT trial (see page 6).

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Treatment with KRAS inhibitors may help mitigate a common driver of genetic alteration across a majority of pancreatic cancers.
Updated results from the BREAKWATER study seemed to be most impactful to the CRC space, according to Michael J. Pishvaian, MD, PhD.
Future research will aim to assess the efficacy of PIPAC-MMC plus systemic therapy vs systemic therapy alone in patients with peritoneal tumors.
Although small incision surgery may serve as a conduit to deliver PIPAC-MMC, it may confer benefits in the staging and treatment of peritoneal tumors.
Patients with peritoneal metastases were historically associated with limited survival and low consideration for clinical trials.
Combining sotorasib with panitumumab may reduce the burden of disease in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer.
Findings from the CodeBreak 300 study have cemented sotorasib/panitumumab as a third-line treatment option for KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer.
Sotorasib plus panitumumab may offer improved survival compared with previously approved treatment options in KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer.
Additional local, regional, or national policy may bolster access to screening for colorectal cancer, according to Aasma Shaukat, MD, MPH.
Related Content