ASCO: Heat Shock Protein 90 Inhibitor Shows Promise in NSCLC

Article

Results from the GALAXY-1 trial showed that the novel second-generation heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitor ganetespib could potentially improve survival in patients with advanced-stage non–small-cell lung cancer.

Results from the GALAXY-1 trial showed that the novel second-generation heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitor ganetespib could potentially improve survival in patients with advanced-stage non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Suresh S. Ramalingam, MD, of Emory University’s Winship Cancer Institute in Atlanta, presented results at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Chicago. He said that the HSP family of inhibitors are “important chaperone proteins for several key cellular oncogenic proteins.” Inhibiting HSP90 could inhibit proteins that are key to NSCLC’s development; in previous work, ganetespib has shown single agent activity and has been well tolerated as both monotherapy and in combination with docetaxel.

In the GALAXY-1 trial, 252 patients were randomized to either a combination of ganetespib and docetaxel or docetaxel alone. Initially, the trial included both adenocarcinoma and non-adenocarcinoma patients, but after 72 of the latter were enrolled, the investigators saw a signal for lack of efficacy and amended the trial to include only adenocarcinoma. The analysis presented at ASCO included 125 patients in the combination group and 127 in the docetaxel alone arm.

The median progression-free survival was 4.5 months in the combination group and 3.2 months in the monotherapy group, for a hazard ratio of 0.84 (90% CI, 0.65–1.07; P = .038). Overall survival was 9.8 months and 7.4 months for the two groups, respectively (HR = 0.82; 90% CI, 0.62–1.09; P = .082).

Patients were stratified by either less than or more than 6 months from diagnosis of advanced disease, and subgroup analysis suggested that those diagnosed more than 6 months prior to treatment were “deriving the robust benefit,” said Dr. Ramalingam. Progression-free survival in just those patients was 5.4 months for the combination group and 3.4 months for the monotherapy group (P = .0041), and overall survival was 10.7 months and 6.4 months, respectively (P = .0093).

“The observed improvement in survival at this point does not appear to be associated with EGFR or KRAS mutational status,” said Dr. Ramalingam. He noted that GALAXY-2, a phase III trial of the therapy in patients with diagnosis at least 6 months earlier, is ongoing.

Natasha B. Leighl, MD, of Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto, commented on the study and agreed that “HSP90 is a very interesting target in lung cancer.” She noted that it was somewhat surprising to see no treatment-related deaths in the study, and no increase in the number of patients that needed to stop therapy because of adverse events in the combination arm.

“I think we see an interesting survival signal in adenocarcinoma from this trial,” said Dr. Leighl. “The combination is more toxic, but dancing with docetaxel is always a bit dangerous.” There were more grade 3/4 adverse events with the combination, at 70% vs 56%.

Recent Videos
The FirstLook liquid biopsy, when used as an adjunct to low-dose CT, may help to address the unmet need of low lung cancer screening utilization.
An 80% sensitivity for lung cancer was observed with the liquid biopsy, with high sensitivity observed for early-stage disease, as well.
Patients who face smoking stigma, perceive a lack of insurance, or have other low-dose CT related concerns may benefit from blood testing for lung cancer.
Advocacy groups such as Cancer Support Community and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society may help support patients with CML undergoing treatment.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, discusses the potential utility of agents such as datopotamab deruxtecan and enfortumab vedotin in patients with breast cancer.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, highlights strategies related to screening and multidisciplinary collaboration for managing ILD in patients who receive T-DXd.
Those with CML should discuss adverse effects such as nausea or fatigue with their providers to help optimize their quality of life during treatment.
Patients with CML can become an active part of their treatment plan by discussing any questions that come to mind with their providers.
Jorge E. Cortes, MD, emphasizes proper communication between patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and their providers during the treatment course.
Dietary interventions or other medications may help mitigate diarrhea in patients who undergo therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia.
Related Content