Avelumab Plus Chemo Improved Survival in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma

News
Article

Neoadjuvant avelumab plus cisplatin yielded high event-free survival in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma.

Neoadjuvant avelumab plus cisplatin yielded high event-free survival in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma.

Neoadjuvant avelumab plus cisplatin yielded high event-free survival in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma.

High event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were observed when neoadjuvant avelumab (Bavencio) plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy was used to treatment patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma, according to results from the 12- and 36-month follow-up results of the phase 2 AURA trial (NCT03674424) presented at the 2024 American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting.

“As we know, cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery is the standard treatment in non-metastatic muscle invasive bladder cancer. Unfortunately, nearly half of the patients are not fit enough to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy,” said lead author Jeremy Blanc, MD, of the Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, and Université Libre de Bruxelles, during the presentation.

For the study, patients were stratified by cisplatin eligibility. Patients who were eligible for cisplatin were randomly assigned 1:1 to either gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) plus avelumab or to dose-dense MVAC (ddMVAC) plus avelumab. Patients who were not eligible to receive cisplatin were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive paclitaxel/gemcitabine (PG) plus avelumab or to avelumab alone.

Previously reported data from the study showed a pathological complete response rate of 58% with ddMVAC, 52% with GC plus avelumab, 32% with avelumab alone, and 14% with PG plus avelumab. The current analysis focused on the key secondary end points of EFS and OS.

In the cisplatin-eligible cohort, the 12- and 36-month EFS among those receiving the ddMVAC regimen was 92% and 79%, respectively. The 12- and 36-month EFS among those receiving GC plus avelumab was 84% and 62%, respectively.

Regarding OS, those receiving the ddMVAC regimen achieved an OS of 95% at 12 months and 85% at 36 months. Those receiving GC plus avelumab achieved an OS of 92% at 12 months and 64% at 36 months.

In the cisplatin-ineligible cohort, the 12-month EFS was 64% among patients who received avelumab alone and 60% among those who received PG plus avelumab. The 12-month OS was 79% among those who received avelumab alone and 82% among those who received PG plus avelumab. At the time of data report, 36-month data for these patients were not yet mature.

Data from both the cisplatin-eligible cohorts and the cisplatin-ineligible cohorts showed that achieving a pathological complete response was associated with improved overall survival.

Overall, the phase 2 AURA trial is a multi-centric, randomized, non-comparative study to explore neoadjuvant avelumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy. To be included in the trial, patients needed to have pathologically-confirmed MIUC with planned radical cystectomy and lymphadenectomy.

The primary end point for the trial was the proportion of patients who achieved a pathological complete response. Secondary end points included the proportion of patients who achieved a <ypT2N0, safety, and EFS and OS at the 12- and 36-month time points.

“To summarize, in the cisplatin-ineligible cohorts, we showed that high event-free survival and overall survival rates can be achieved at 12 and 36 months in patients treated with neoadjuvant avelumab in combination with cisplatin-based chemotherapy, and in particular, in patients treated with the ddMVAC regimen. In the cisplatin-ineligible cohort, as expected, we show a lower survival outcome at 12 months with no additional benefit of paclitaxel/gemcitabine regimen,” Blanc concluded in the presentation. “We know that further investigation through a phase 3 trial is very important to validate our findings. We believe that the identification of biomarkers could also optimize muscle-invasive bladder cancer care and patient selection.”

Reference

Blanc J, Carnot A, Barthelemy P, et al. Avelumab (A) as neoadjuvant therapy in patients (pts) with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC): Survival data of AURA trial, Oncodistinct 004. Presented at: 2024 American Society for Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting. May 31-June 4, Chicago, Illinois. Abstract 4516. doi/10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.4516


Recent Videos
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Using bispecific antibodies before or after CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma is an area of education for community oncologists.
Bulkiness of disease did not appear to impact PFS outcomes with ibrutinib plus venetoclax in the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study.
Optimal cancer survivorship care may entail collaboration between a treating oncologist and a cancer survivorship expert.
Related Content