Chromosomal Changes Predict Clinical Response to Sunitinib in RCC

Article

Clinical response can be challenging to predict in some cancers, but new research has shown the ability to predict response to sunitinib (Sutent) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Clinical response can be challenging to predict in some cancers, but new research has shown the ability to predict response to sunitinib (Sutent) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Chung-Han Lee, MD, and colleagues were interested in learning more about RCC and why 20% to 30% of patients' tumors become resistant to sunitinib, the first-line therapy for clear cell RCC.

Dr. Lee presented their findings in a poster session (abstract 4552) at the 2015 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, held May 29-June 2, 2015 in Chicago. The findings can also be found in the May 2015 online issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology.1

Their study sought to identify the chromosomal copy number changes that are associated with sunitinib clinical response. Copy number variations are deletions or duplications of a segment of DNA. These variations can involve gains or losses of genomic DNA that are either microscopic or submicroscopic, and may not be visible by standard G-banding karyotyping.Karyotyping is a test to examine chromosomes in a sample of cells, which can help identify genetic problems as the cause of disease.

Whole genome comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) was performed on pretreatment tumor derived DNA from 76 patients who had been given sunitinib. This process identified differential copy number alterations. Using databases comprising of patients who had not yet been given sunitinib (TCGA-436 and University of Tokyo-240), these alterations were not correlated with overall survival, suggesting that these alterations reflect sunitinib response, and not sunitinib-independent tumor biology.

The researchers concluded that an aCGH analysis of sunitinib-treated clear cell RCC patients revealed multiple novel copy number alterations associated with clinical response. Further study will provide more insight into how exactly sunitinib resistance occurs and how the mechanisms work, but these appear to be positive findings.

 

 

References:

 

 

Recent Videos
An “avalanche of funding” has propelled the kidney cancer field forward, says Jason Muhitch, PhD.
Kidney cancer advocacy efforts have spread the urgency and importance of funding research in the field to members of Congress.
Advocacy efforts have yielded a dramatic increase in kidney cancer research, according to Elizabeth P. Henske, MD.
A review of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma shows radiological tumor burden as an independent prognostic factor for survival.
A phase 2 trial is assessing ubamatamab in patients with MUC16-expressing SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma and epithelioid sarcoma.
Analysis of 2 phase 1 trials compared gut biome diversity between standard of care with or without CBM588 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Advocacy groups such as Cancer Support Community and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society may help support patients with CML undergoing treatment.
Related Content