Cognitive Impairment, Depression Affect Oral Cancer Therapy Adherence

Article

Patients with working memory dysfunctions and depression may be more likely to be nonadherent to oral cancer therapies, according to the results of a study presented at ESMO.

Patients with working memory dysfunctions and depression may be more likely to be nonadherent to oral cancer therapies, according to the results of a study (abstract 1479P) presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress, held October 7–11 in Copenhagen, Denmark.

As the number of oral anticancer therapies in the oncology therapeutic arsenal continues to increase, it is important to track factors that influence adherence to medication, according to study researchers Florence Joly, MD, and Melanie Dos Santos, MD, of the Centre Francois Baclesse in Caen, France. In this study, the researchers assessed the relationship between cognitive functions and oral medication adherence to identify patients that were more likely to be nonadherent.

“This study included patients starting a new oral therapy and half were over 70 years of age,” the researchers said in a press release. “Before starting treatment, a standardized neuropsychological test battery including an assessment of autonomy, depression, and anxiety were performed.”

Information on sociodemographic conditions was also collected. Adherence to oral therapy was evaluated by two self-assessment questionnaires and an observance sheet at 1 and 3 months after treatment initiation.

At 1 month, 126 patients were enrolled in the study and 88% had completed the adherence questionnaire. The observed adherence rate was 90%.

Using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, researchers observed global cognitive impairment in one-half of patients. They found two factors significantly associated with oral medication nonadherence: working memory disorders (1.38; 95% CI, 1.03–1.85; P = .0326) and depression (4.67; 95% CI, 1.11–19.59; P = .0352).

According to the researchers, “focusing on cognitive functions before initiation of oral anticancer therapy is therefore relevant to identify patient profiles more likely to fail self-management of oral anticancer therapy and therefore help decision-making, particularly in the elderly.”

Commenting on the results of this study, Bettina Ryll, MD, chair of the ESMO Patient Advocacy Working Group, said: “I believe the current concept of adherence is too narrow-ie, physicians expect patients to take their medication as prescribed and nonadherence is considered a form of disobedience. Intentional nonadherence, the patient deciding not to take medication as indicated, is actually revealing patients’ true preferences and these might simply be very different from what physicians and other stakeholders consider relevant. So instead of enforcing adherence against patients’ preferences, we need to first understand and then tackle the true reasons underlying nonadherence.”

Recent Videos
Preliminary phase 2 trial data show durvalumab plus lenalidomide was superior to durvalumab alone in refractory/advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Performance status, age, and comorbidities may impact benefit seen with immunotherapy vs chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.
Developing odronextamab combinations following CAR T-cell therapy failure may help elicit responses in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Related Content