ctDNA Data in Gynecologic Cancer RT Population May Be Hypothesis-Generating

Commentary
Video

A prospective trial may help affirm ctDNA as a non-invasive option of predicting responses to radiotherapy among those with gynecologic cancers.

Evidence from a study assessing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a potential predictor of response to radiotherapy in patients with gynecologic malignancies is “compelling,” although ctDNA currently remains an early investigational tool in this population and should be studied in a prospective manner, according to A. Gabriella Wernicke, MD, MSc.

CancerNetwork® spoke with Wernicke, a clinical professor at Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell and radiation oncologist at Lenox Hill Hospital of Northwell Health Cancer Institute in New Hyde Park, New York, about the next steps for researching the use of ctDNA in patients undergoing radiotherapy for gynecologic cancers following findings from a study she presented at the 2024 American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Annual Meeting. Data from her presentation demonstrated that ctDNA may be a feasible predictive biomarker of response to radiotherapy or chemoradiation in this patient population.

Looking ahead, Wernicke said these results should prompt her colleagues to think about ctDNA as a potentially noninvasive tool that should be studied prospectively to further clarify how it may predict treatment outcomes in those with gynecologic cancers. Additionally, data from a prospective trial may shed light on reducing toxicities and customizing treatment strategies for those who are receiving radiotherapy.

Wernicke stated that she wanted to thank the ASTRO Scientific Committee for selecting her group’s work for an oral presentation at the meeting.

Transcript:

This evidence is very compelling and certainly hypothesis-generating. A predominant number of our patients in this trial [had] advanced diseases of vulvar and cervical cancers. We’ve noticed some interesting, similar results with recurrent endometrial and vaginal cancer. It would be great to expand the study population to a prospective trial, which will be underway, and study these intriguing data in a prospective manner. We believe that if we truly prove the concept [from the] preliminary data so far, that might shed light not only on the response but also on reducing the toxicity early enough or changing the management by making it more customized to patients.

What I would tell my colleagues in the field is that this is an early investigation and remains an investigational tool. But having such intriguing results should prompt us to think about this relatively non-invasive option as something that should be studied prospectively and considered in patients who are bound to develop severe toxicity and not know their prognosis or outcome for a long time. To my mind, this has a bright future; let’s see what bends out with prospective studies and the results of these studies.

Reference

Wernicke G, Gui B, Shalamov MM, et al. Early assessment of response using ctDNA as a non-invasive biomarker in patients with gynecologic malignancies undergoing radiotherapy. Presented at: 2024 American Society for Radiation Oncology Annual Meeting; September 29-October 2, 2024; Washington, DC. Abstract 106.

Recent Videos
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Patients who face smoking stigma, perceive a lack of insurance, or have other low-dose CT related concerns may benefit from blood testing for lung cancer.
Establishment of an AYA Lymphoma Consortium has facilitated a process to better understand and address gaps in knowledge for this patient group.
Adult and pediatric oncology collaboration in assessing nivolumab in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma facilitated the phase 3 SWOG S1826 findings.
Treatment paradigms differ between adult and pediatric oncologists when treating young adults with lymphoma.
Differences in pancreatic cancer responses to treatment elicits a need to better educate patients on expectations in treatment, particularly chemotherapy.
Increasing patient awareness of modifiable risk factors for pancreatic cancer may help mitigate incidence of pancreatic cancers.
It may be crucial to test every patient for markers such as BRAF V600E mutations, NRG1 fusions, and KRAS G12C mutations to help manage pancreatic cancers.
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, emphasizes the idea of moving targeted therapies to earlier lines of treatment to further improve outcomes in pancreatic cancer.
The Together for Supportive Cancer Care coalition may advance the national conversation in ensuring comprehensive care for all patients with cancer.
Related Content