Defensive Documentation Reduces Liability

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 9 No 9
Volume 9
Issue 9

SAN ANTONIO-“Ninety-nine percent of the people you treat are not going to sue you,” Marilyn Frank-Stromborg, EdD, JD, said at the Oncology Nursing Society’s 25th Annual Congress. But for that small percentage of cases where there are going to be problems, you must know how to protect yourself and your institution, she said, and that begins with the practice of “defensive documentation.”

SAN ANTONIO—“Ninety-nine percent of the people you treat are not going to sue you,” Marilyn Frank-Stromborg, EdD, JD, said at the Oncology Nursing Society’s 25th Annual Congress. But for that small percentage of cases where there are going to be problems, you must know how to protect yourself and your institution, she said, and that begins with the practice of “defensive documentation.”

This type of documentation is akin to the practice of “defensive medicine” that physicians have been practicing for years by ordering a variety of tests to cover all possible scenarios. Defensive documentation consists of accurate and complete patient charting, said Dr. Frank-Stromborg, chair and professor, School of Nursing, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb.

This includes documentation of the patient’s history, physical changes, medications, treatments, chemotherapy administration, side effects, any complications encountered, family concerns, and all telephone conversations.

“The patient record not only serves as the confidential record of all the care that was provided, but it is a business and a legal document,” Dr. Frank-Stromborg said. The patient record is the first piece of evidence that will be looked at when professional negligence is alleged.

When a person commits a negligent act in his or her professional capacity that results in an injury, it is called malpractice,” Dr. Frank-Stromborg said.

In any medical malpractice suit brought against a nurse, the patient must prove the following: that the nurse owed a duty of care to that patient, that the nurse breached the duty with conduct that violated the standard of care recognized in the profession, and lastly that the patient suffered damages as a result.

The patient must prove that the breach of duty was the cause of the suffering. “We call that the ‘but for,’” Dr. Frank-Stromborg said. “‘But for’ what you did, the patient would have been fine.”

There are several situations in a medical record that can raise a red flag for the attorney trying the case, Dr. Frank-Stromborg said. Time gaps or improbable events are two of these. “Remember, it is your peers reading the medical records. They read your notes, and they know what is probable and improbable,” she said.

The omission of key facts, the omission of safety interventions, and limited nursing assessments are also problematic. “If you have a seasoned clinician reading your notes, that person knows how many assessments you should be making,” Dr. Frank-Stromborg said.

Altered records, unsigned chart entries, and sloppy, incomplete records will also alert the patient’s attorney to a potential problem. Alteration of records can be very serious, and in some states nurses who do so may have their license revoked.

Risk Reduction Strategies

There are several strategies that can be employed to reduce the chances of a lawsuit, Dr. Frank-Stromborg said. One of the most important of these is to maintain a legible record that can be deciphered by all individuals who need to review the chart.

Records must not be ambiguous, she cautioned. Whether or not good medical care was provided, lawyers can always use an ambiguous chart entry to their advantage. Even if a practice is standard, it must be placed in the record. “The presumption in the law is that if it is not documented, it was not done,” she said.

Conversations must also be recorded, particularly instructions to the patient and referrals. The failure to correctly document vital information that would be used by other health care providers in rendering treatment can result in a malpractice action.

Information entered into a patient’s record must be checked. A medical record that is considered complete and thorough may still be considered inaccurate documentation if it contains erroneous information.

“And just when you thought you couldn’t handle any more responsibility, nurses should also do what is necessary to ensure that other members of the health care team meet their respective responsibilities for charting,” Dr. Frank-Stromborg said.

If errors are made, they must be reported. “Nurses have an ethical and a professional obligation to report their own errors,” she said. “As more and more attention is given to the high incidence of medication errors, you may start seeing federal legislation mandating that health care professionals report their mistakes or suffer having criminal charges levied against them.”

There are several simple rules to follow to ensure the record is complete and accurate, she said. These include writing in the correct chart, making entries in order of consecutive shifts and dates, and writing the complete date and time of each entry.

Concise, factual, concrete, and specific terminology must be used. However, Dr. Frank-Stromborg said, “you want to use the patient’s words in describing symptoms, so you should get comfortable using quotes.”

Acceptable hospital abbreviations may be used, but she advised against use of other types of abbreviations.

Charting should be done in ink, and each entry should be signed with the nurse’s name and title, with no space between the end of the charting and the name.

There are also several charting behavior habits that must be avoided, Dr. Frank-Stromborg said. These include charting in advance. “I have actually seen charts where people wrote ‘patient tolerated procedure well’ only to have the patient bleed out during the procedure, and then you are in the position of having to defend how and why you charted in advance.”

Nurses should avoid relative statements such as “wound is healing,” she said. “Measure it. Talk about the dressing. Talk about the smell. Talk about the color.”

Recent Videos
Certain bridging therapies and abundant steroid use may complicate the T-cell collection process during CAR T therapy.
Pancreatic cancer is projected to become the second-leading cause of cancer-related deaths by 2030 in the United States.
2 experts are featured in this video
2 experts are featured in this video
2 experts are featured in this video
4 KOLs are featured in this series.
Educating community practices on CAR T referral and sequencing treatment strategies may help increase CAR T utilization.
The FirstLook liquid biopsy, when used as an adjunct to low-dose CT, may help to address the unmet need of low lung cancer screening utilization.
Related Content