Elizabeth Plimack, MD, MS, Talks Risk Categories in KEYNOTE-426 Trial on Advanced RCC

Video

Elizabeth Plimack, MD, MS, discussed the analysis of risk categories for patients included in the KEYNOTYE-426 trial investigating axitinib and pembrolizumab over sunitinib for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Elizabeth Plimack, MD, MS, of the Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia, discussed the analysis of risk categories for patients when investigating axitinib (Inlyta) and pembrolizumab (Keytruda) over sunitinib (Sutent) in the updated analysis of KEYNOTE-426 presented at the 2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program.

Transcription:

One of the other analyses we did was look at risk categories: favorable risk vs poor and intermediate risk. In the poor and intermediate risk categories the benefit to overall survival, progression-free survival, and response rate remains and is highly statistically significant. In the favorable risk group, there was a benefit in terms of progression-free survival and response rate, but not overall survival. My commentary on that is that these patients do well. They are good risk or favorable risk. In this group of patients, it may just take longer for us to see any difference in overall survival since the vast majority are still alive, which is a good thing on this study.

Recent Videos
An “avalanche of funding” has propelled the kidney cancer field forward, says Jason Muhitch, PhD.
Kidney cancer advocacy efforts have spread the urgency and importance of funding research in the field to members of Congress.
Advocacy efforts have yielded a dramatic increase in kidney cancer research, according to Elizabeth P. Henske, MD.
A review of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma shows radiological tumor burden as an independent prognostic factor for survival.
A phase 2 trial is assessing ubamatamab in patients with MUC16-expressing SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma and epithelioid sarcoma.
Analysis of 2 phase 1 trials compared gut biome diversity between standard of care with or without CBM588 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Related Content