The CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy lisocabtagene maraleucel was granted priority review by the FDA following an application for its use in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma receiving therapy in the second-line setting.
The FDA has granted priority review to a supplemental biologics license application for lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel; Breyanzi) as treatment for second-line relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma, according to a press release from the agent’s developer Bristol Myers Squibb.1
Data from the randomized phase 3 TRANSFORM trial (NCT03575351) supported the FDA’s decision, in which the CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy resulted in a statistically significant improvement in event-free survival (EFS) vs standard-of-care (SOC) in this patient population.2
“[Liso-cel] as a differentiated CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy has already proven to be an important treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy and now has the potential to be a new standard of care for patients after failure of first-line therapy, offering significantly improved outcomes beyond the current mainstay of care,” Anne Kerber, senior vice president of Cell Therapy Development at Bristol Myers Squibb, said in a press release. “This acceptance from the FDA brings us one step closer to delivering a practice-changing treatment for primary refractory or relapsed large B-cell lymphoma, making [liso-cel] available to more patients in need, and underscores the advancements we’re making in cell therapy research to transform the lives of patients with difficult-to-treat blood cancers, including lymphoma.”
Results from the trial that were reported at the 2021 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting & Exposition showed a median EFS of 10.1 months (95% CI, 6.1–not reached [NR]) in the liso-cel arm vs 2.3 months (95% CI, 2.2-4.3) among those treated with SOC (HR, 0.349; 95% CI, 0.229-0.530; P <.0001). Rates of EFS at 6 months were 63.3% (95% CI, 52.0%-74.7%) and 33.4% (95% CI, 23.0%-43.8%), respectively; corresponding rates at 12 months were 44.5% (95% CI, 29.4%-59.6%) and 23.7% (95% CI, 13.4%-34.1%).
The objective response rate with liso-cel was 86% (95% CI, 77.0%-92.3%) vs 48% (95% CI, 37.3%-58.5%) in the SOC arm. The rates of complete response were 66% (95% CI, 55.7%-75.8%) and 39% (95% CI, 29.1%-49.9%), respectively (P <.0001).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the liso-cel cohort was 14.8 months (95% CI, 6.6-NR) vs 5.7 months (95% CI, 3.9-9.4) in the SOC cohort (HR, 0.406; 95% CI, 0.250-0.659; P = .0001). Overall survival was not reached in either cohort, but there was a trend toward favorable outcomes in the experimental arm (HR, 0.509; 95% CI, 0.258-1.004; P = .0257).
At the data cut-off for the analysis, the median follow-up time for the liso-cel (n = 67) and SOC (n = 68) arms was 6.2 months. Those included in the analysis were patients who underwent leukapheresis followed by randomization, with the liso-cel arm receiving 100 x 106 CAR T cells and SOC having 3 cycles of salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation.
With liso-cel treatment, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurological events (NEs) occurred in 49% and 12% of patients, respectively.
Previously, the FDA issued an approval to liso-cel in the treatment of adult patients with certain types of large B-cell lymphoma following 2 or more prior therapies.
The FDA set a Prescription Drug User Fee Act date for this application of June 24, 2022.