Frontline Combination Therapy Intensification May Improve Survival in NSCLC

Commentary
Video

Higher, durable rates of response to frontline therapy are needed to potentially improve long-term survival among patients with non–small cell lung cancer.

At the 2024 European Society for Medical Oncology Congress (ESMO), CancerNetwork® spoke with Nicolas Girard, MD, about findings from the phase 2 RELATIVITY-104 study (NCT04623775) and how they may align with current clinical practice guidelines and recommendations for the first-line treatment of patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

According to Girard, head of the Curie-Montsouris Thorax Institute and professor of Respiratory Medicine at Versailles Saint Quentin University Paris Saclay Campus in Paris, France, higher and longer rates of response are needed to potentially prolong long-term survival in patients who receive immunotherapy plus chemotherapy. Based on findings showing that longer responses correlated with 5-year survival in patients who received immunotherapy plus chemotherapy, Girard said it is important to innovate in the first-line therapy setting by intensifying and combining treatment modalities.

In the RELATIVITY-104 study, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.7 months (95% CI, 5.6-8.4) in patients who received relatlimab-rmbw plus nivolumab (Opdualag) and chemotherapy compared with 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.5-6.9) in those who received nivolumab (Opdivo) and chemotherapy (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.71-1.11). The overall response rate was 51.3% vs 43.7% in each arm, and the median duration of response was 10.1 months vs 9.1 months.

Transcript:

The [current] treatment recommendation is [immunotherapy monotherapy] for PD-L1 above 50% in tumors and chemotherapy plus [immunotherapy regardless of the] PD-L1 status. The unmet need is that we need higher response rates and more durable responses to, in the end, have a higher proportion of patients with long-term survival.

Right now, in first-line [NSCLC], after chemotherapy post-immunotherapy, the overall survival [rate] at 5 years is approximately 20% to 25%. It’s mostly related to long responders to first-line treatment. The contribution of first-line treatment is important, and this is why it’s important to have innovation in these settings through combination and intensification of the treatment.

Reference

Girard N, Burotto M, Paz-Ares LG. Nivolumab (NIVO) plus relatlimab with platinum-doublet chemotherapy (PDCT) vs NIVO + PDCT as first-line (1L) treatment (tx) for stage IV or recurrent NSCLC: Results from the randomized phase II RELATIVITY-104 study. Presented at: 2024 ESMO Congress; September 13-17, 2024; Barcelona, Spain. Abstract LBA53.

Recent Videos
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Patients who face smoking stigma, perceive a lack of insurance, or have other low-dose CT related concerns may benefit from blood testing for lung cancer.
Establishment of an AYA Lymphoma Consortium has facilitated a process to better understand and address gaps in knowledge for this patient group.
Adult and pediatric oncology collaboration in assessing nivolumab in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma facilitated the phase 3 SWOG S1826 findings.
Treatment paradigms differ between adult and pediatric oncologists when treating young adults with lymphoma.
Differences in pancreatic cancer responses to treatment elicits a need to better educate patients on expectations in treatment, particularly chemotherapy.
Increasing patient awareness of modifiable risk factors for pancreatic cancer may help mitigate incidence of pancreatic cancers.
It may be crucial to test every patient for markers such as BRAF V600E mutations, NRG1 fusions, and KRAS G12C mutations to help manage pancreatic cancers.
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, emphasizes the idea of moving targeted therapies to earlier lines of treatment to further improve outcomes in pancreatic cancer.
Related Content