Genetic Prostate Cancer Studies Are Needed to Push the Needle Forward

Commentary
Video

Robust genetic testing guidelines in the prostate cancer space must be supported by strong clinical research before they can be properly implemented, says William J. Catalona, MD.

Research into genetic testing as a tool for localized diagnosis is still in its early days across most cancer types, and prostate cancer is no exception, according to William J. Catalona, MD.

In a conversation with CancerNetwork® during the 2023 Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) Annual Meeting, Catalona, a professor of urology at the Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, emphasized the necessity of conducting additional genetic studies in the prostate cancer space to collect firm evidence. From there, robust guidelines can be drafted and implemented.

Transcript:

We're relatively early in the phase of genetic studies of prostate cancer. Many of [our] colleagues may not be as familiar with all of the latest developments if their area is focused in, say, radiation therapy, medical oncology, or other areas. Hopefully, they [have] learned a little something about what's current in the genetics of prostate cancer [from my presentation]. The other thing is that we really need to [base] our clinical guidelines for managing patients on firm scientific evidence. Without the genetic research, that firm scientific evidence is not there. Once we have the firm scientific evidence, then we have robust guidelines. But then we have to move beyond the robust guidelines into a field called implementation science, where we have to persuade the doctors and patients out there to do the right thing because there's good scientific evidence to support adopting these guidelines.

Reference

Catalona WJ. Localized diagnosis: genetic testing. 2023 Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) Annual Meeting; November 28-December 1, 2023; Washington, DC.

Recent Videos
The FirstLook liquid biopsy, when used as an adjunct to low-dose CT, may help to address the unmet need of low lung cancer screening utilization.
An 80% sensitivity for lung cancer was observed with the liquid biopsy, with high sensitivity observed for early-stage disease, as well.
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Patients who face smoking stigma, perceive a lack of insurance, or have other low-dose CT related concerns may benefit from blood testing for lung cancer.
Establishment of an AYA Lymphoma Consortium has facilitated a process to better understand and address gaps in knowledge for this patient group.
Adult and pediatric oncology collaboration in assessing nivolumab in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma facilitated the phase 3 SWOG S1826 findings.
Treatment paradigms differ between adult and pediatric oncologists when treating young adults with lymphoma.
Differences in pancreatic cancer responses to treatment elicits a need to better educate patients on expectations in treatment, particularly chemotherapy.
Increasing patient awareness of modifiable risk factors for pancreatic cancer may help mitigate incidence of pancreatic cancers.
It may be crucial to test every patient for markers such as BRAF V600E mutations, NRG1 fusions, and KRAS G12C mutations to help manage pancreatic cancers.
Related Content