Genetic Prostate Cancer Studies Are Needed to Push the Needle Forward

Commentary
Video

Robust genetic testing guidelines in the prostate cancer space must be supported by strong clinical research before they can be properly implemented, says William J. Catalona, MD.

Research into genetic testing as a tool for localized diagnosis is still in its early days across most cancer types, and prostate cancer is no exception, according to William J. Catalona, MD.

In a conversation with CancerNetwork® during the 2023 Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) Annual Meeting, Catalona, a professor of urology at the Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, emphasized the necessity of conducting additional genetic studies in the prostate cancer space to collect firm evidence. From there, robust guidelines can be drafted and implemented.

Transcript:

We're relatively early in the phase of genetic studies of prostate cancer. Many of [our] colleagues may not be as familiar with all of the latest developments if their area is focused in, say, radiation therapy, medical oncology, or other areas. Hopefully, they [have] learned a little something about what's current in the genetics of prostate cancer [from my presentation]. The other thing is that we really need to [base] our clinical guidelines for managing patients on firm scientific evidence. Without the genetic research, that firm scientific evidence is not there. Once we have the firm scientific evidence, then we have robust guidelines. But then we have to move beyond the robust guidelines into a field called implementation science, where we have to persuade the doctors and patients out there to do the right thing because there's good scientific evidence to support adopting these guidelines.

Reference

Catalona WJ. Localized diagnosis: genetic testing. 2023 Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) Annual Meeting; November 28-December 1, 2023; Washington, DC.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Response rates appeared to be higher with avutometinib plus defactinib vs avutometinib alone in the phase 2 RAMP 201 study.
Patients who respond to avutometinib/defactinib may be maintained on treatment for long periods of time, says Rachel N. Grisham, MD.
Treatment with lorlatinib might be effective regardless of the presence of central nervous system metastases, according to Misako Nagasaka, MD, PhD.
Most central nervous system events with lorlatinib were grade 1 or 2 in the phase 3 CROWN trial.
Treatment with lorlatinib did not increase cardiovascular events among patients with ALK-positive non–small cell lung cancer in the CROWN trial.
Related Content