How SBRT Has Evolved Over the Decades to Manage Kidney Cancer

Video

An expert from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas gives an overview of the multimodal use of stereotactic radiation for the treatment of patients with metastatic kidney cancer.

During the 2022 Society for Urologic Oncology (SUO) Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® spoke with Raquibul Hannan, MD, PhD, a professor in the Department of Radiation Oncology, Urology and Immunology at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas about how the use of stereotactic radiation has been adapted for the treatment of patients with metastatic kidney cancer.

Hannan highlighted stereotactic radiation’s original purpose of managing brain and spinal metastases in the palliative setting before describing some of the challenges involved in delivering radiation doses to patients. He, however, said that using stereotactic radiation was a collaborative effort between urologists and neurosurgeons.

“[Stereotactic radiation] is always done in the multimodality setting where we work with the neurosurgeons, and if they’re able to resect, they will resect it first, and we come in with stereotactic radiation in the postoperative setting,” he said.

Transcript:

So, in the palliative setting, the brain metastases [are] actually where stereotactic radiation therapy originated. Back even as early as the late 90s and early 2000s, we have seen very good control rates. The control rates are close to 100% for some of these brain metastases. For spine metastasis, [it is] a little bit more challenging because the spinal cord is right there. And that limits our ability to deliver a high ablative radiation dose to give local control. But it's always done in the multimodality setting where we work with the neurosurgeons, and if they're able to resect, they will resect it first, and we come in with stereotactic radiation in the postoperative setting.

Recent Videos
A review of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma shows radiological tumor burden as an independent prognostic factor for survival.
A phase 2 trial is assessing ubamatamab in patients with MUC16-expressing SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma and epithelioid sarcoma.
Analysis of 2 phase 1 trials compared gut biome diversity between standard of care with or without CBM588 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Rohit Gosain, MD; Sumanta Kumar Pal, MD, FASCO; and Rahul Gosain, MD, presenting slides
Related Content