Immunochemotherapy Remains Standard for High-Risk Follicular Lymphoma

News
Article

Immunochemotherapy should remain the standard induction approach for patients with high-risk follicular lymphoma.

A follow-up analysis of the phase III randomized SWOG S0016 study showed that immunochemotherapy should remain the standard induction approach for patients with high-risk follicular lymphoma, according to Mazyar Shadman, MD, MPH, of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, and colleagues.

These findings were published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

A total of 531 previously untreated patients with intermediate- or high-risk, advanced-stage (stage II to IV) follicular lymphoma were enrolled in the study between 2001 and 2008 and randomly assigned to receive 6 cycles of rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP; n = 267) or 6 cycles of CHOP followed by consolidation with 131I-tositumomab radioimmunotherapy (CHOP-RIT; n = 264).

At a median follow-up of 10.3 years, 10-year rates of progression-free and overall survival were 49% and 78% among all patients, respectively. The 10-year rates of progression-free survival were better in the CHOP-RIT arm (56% vs 42% for patients in the R-CHOP arm; P = .01). But the difference between the 10-year overall survival rates (81% for R-CHOP vs 75% for CHOP-RIT) was not statistically significant.

Patients in both study arms experienced similar rates of secondary cancers (16% vs 15% for R-CHOP and CHOP-RIT, respectively), including hematologic, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, gynecologic, lung, breast, head and neck, thyroid, and skin cancer.

A numerically higher rate of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia (4.9% vs 1.8%) in the CHOP-RIT arm fell just short of statistical significance (P = .058). But the estimated 10-year cumulative incidence of death from myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia was significantly higher for patients in the CHOP-RIT arm compared with the R-CHOP arm (4% vs 0.9%; P = .02), despite the small number of patients in question, consistent with previously reported findings among patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma, the authors noted.

In the future, new noncytotoxic therapies could change the treatment options for patients with advanced follicular lymphoma. But for the time-being, immunochemotherapy should remain the standard of care for induction therapy, Shadman concluded.

Recent Videos
Preliminary phase 2 trial data show durvalumab plus lenalidomide was superior to durvalumab alone in refractory/advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Developing odronextamab combinations following CAR T-cell therapy failure may help elicit responses in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Investigators are currently evaluating mosunetuzumab in relapsed disease or comparing it with rituximab in treatment-naïve follicular lymphoma.
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Establishment of an AYA Lymphoma Consortium has facilitated a process to better understand and address gaps in knowledge for this patient group.
Adult and pediatric oncology collaboration in assessing nivolumab in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma facilitated the phase 3 SWOG S1826 findings.
Treatment paradigms differ between adult and pediatric oncologists when treating young adults with lymphoma.
No evidence indicates synergistic toxicity when combining radiation with CAR T-cell therapy in this population, according to Timothy Robinson, MD, PhD.
Related Content