Isa-VRd Shows Efficacy and Safety in Frail Transplant-Ineligible Myeloma

Fact checked by Russ Conroy
News
Article

Subgroup data from the IMROZ trial showed Isa-VRd improved survival and responses vs VRd alone in patients who were frail with newly diagnosed myeloma.

Isatuximab plus bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone elicited improved responses compared with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone alone in multiple myeloma.

Isatuximab plus bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone elicited improved responses compared with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone alone in multiple myeloma.

Isatuximab-irfc (Sarclisa) in combination with bortezomib (Velcade), lenalidomide (Revlimid), and dexamethasone (Isa-VRd) improved survival and response rates while demonstrating a tolerable safety profile compared with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) in patients with transplant-ineligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were considered frail, according to a post hoc subgroup analysis of the phase 3 IMROZ trial (NCT03319667) published in Haematologica.1

With a median follow-up of 59.7 months, Isa-VRd demonstrated a median progression-free survival (PFS) of not reached (NR) vs 28.91 months with VRd in patients who were frail (HR, 0.518; 95% CI, 0.294-0.912; P = .0227) and NR vs 59.70 months, respectively, in patients who were not frail (HR, 0.615; 95% CI, 0.419-0.903; P = .0131). The 60-month PFS rate for patients who were frail was 52.6% with Isa-VRd vs 36.2% with VRd. For patients who were not frail, they were 66.6% vs 48.8%, respectively.

Additionally, the study authors noted that within all treatment arms, patients who were frail experienced worse PFS than those who were not frail (Isa-VRd: HR, 0.531; 95% CI, 0.335-0.842; P = .0071; VRd: HR, 0.487; 95% CI, 0.302-0.785; P = .0031). When stratifying for age, patients who were 75 years or younger and frail experienced better outcomes with Isa-VRd vs VRd (HR, 0.511; 95% CI, 0.232-1.125; P = .0953); in patients who were between 76 and 80 years and frail, the benefit of Isa-VRd vs VRd was not statistically significant (HR, 0.733; 95% CI, 0.348-1.544; P = .4139).

In patients with frailty in the intention-to-treat group, minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity was achieved by 47.8% of patients with Isa-VRd and 22.0% with VRd (OR, 3.250; 95% CI, 1.433-7.372; P = .0040), and complete responses (CRs) or better were achieved by 46.4% and 20.0%, respectively (OR, 3.459; 95% CI, 1.495-8.006; P = .0030). In patients who were not frail, MRD negativity and CRs or better was achieved by 58.6% of patients with Isa-VRd and 50.0% with VRd (OR, 1.413; 95% CI, 0.901-2.214; P = .1316).

Overall survival (OS) data were immature at the time of analysis. The 60-month OS rate was 48.8% with Isa-VRd and 43.7% with VRd in patients who were frail and 79.9% vs 74.9%, respectively, in patients who were not frail. A survival analysis stratified by cause of death due to disease progression vs not due to disease progression showed that, in the frail subgroup, 8.7% of patients with Isa-VRd and 20.0% with VRd died due to disease progression (HR, 0.426; 95% CI, 0.155-1.172; P = .983) vs 3.6% and 9.4%, respectively, in the non-frail subgroup (HR, 0.379; 95% CI, 0.149-0.963; P = .0414).

“This post hoc subgroup analysis of the IMROZ trial by frailty status demonstrated that Isa-VRd is an effective option with a manageable safety profile for [patients with frailty who are 80 years or younger], with [transplant-ineligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma], accounting for approximately one-third of patients in IMROZ,” wrote senior study author Thierry Facon, MD, a professor of Hematology in the Department of Hematology at Lille University Hospital in Lille, France, and coauthors.1 “This is the first demonstration of a quadruplet regimen consisting of an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody in combination with VRd that is safe and efficacious in all patients aged [80 years or younger] not eligible for transplant regardless of frailty status.”

A total of 446 patients were randomly assigned, in a 3:2 ratio, to receive either Isa-VRd followed by isatuximab with lenalidomide and dexamethasone or VRd followed by lenalidomide and dexamethasone. During the induction phase, VRd consisted of subcutaneous bortezomib as 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 22, 25, 29, and 32; oral lenalidomide at 25 mg on days 1 to 14 and days 22 to 35; and oral dexamethasone at 20 mg a day. Isatuximab was administered at 10 mg/kg weekly for cycle 1 and biweekly in subsequent cycles.

During continuous treatment, patients received 25 mg of lenalidomide per day and 20 mg of dexamethasone weekly; isatuximab was given intravenously at 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks and then, from cycle 18 onwards, every 4 weeks.

Eligible patients were 80 years or younger with transplant-ineligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Patients with an ECOG performance status greater than 2 were excluded.

Patients were considered frail with a simplified International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) frailty score of 2 or higher and were not frail with a score of 0 or 1. Scores were calculated using age, ECOG performance status, and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores at baseline.

Regarding safety, in patients who were frail, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade occurred in 100.0% with Isa-VRd and 98.0% with VRd and, in patients who were not frail, 99.5% vs 98.4%, respectively. Of grade 3 or higher TEAEs, in patients who were frail, they occurred in 91.2% vs 88.0%, respectively, and in patients who were not frail, they occurred in 91.7% vs 82.0%. Of patients who were frail, grade 5 TEAEs were observed in 13.2% with Isa-VRd and 10.0% with VRd and, of patients who were not frail, in 10.4% vs 3.9%. The most common grade 3 or higher TEAE in the frail subgroup was neutropenia (36.8% with Isa-VRd and 16.0% with VRd).

Previously, the FDA approved Isa-VRd in transplant-ineligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in September 2024 based on prior results from the IMROZ trial.2

References

  1. Manier S, Dimopoulos MA, Leleu XP, et al. Isatuximab plus bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a frailty subgroup analysis of the IMROZ trial. Haematologica. Published online March 20, 2025. doi:10.3324/haematol.2024.287200
  2. FDA approves istauximab-irfc with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. FDA. News release. September 20, 2024. Accessed April 7, 2025. https://shorturl.at/B8d3c

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
4 experts are featured in this series.
4 experts are featured in this series.
4 experts are featured in this series.
4 experts are featured in this series.
4 experts are featured in this series.
4 experts are featured in this series.
4 experts are featured in this series.
4 experts are featured in this series.
4 experts are featured in this series.
4 experts are featured in this series.
Related Content