Kelley Lauren Coffman, MD, Responses to and Adverse Effects of Therapy With 177Lu-DOTATATE in Well-Differentiated, High-Grade NETs

Video

The hospitalist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center discussed the results of a study which evaluated the use of 177Lu-DOTATATE in patients with well-differentiated, high-grade neuroendocrine tumors.

Investigators observed a meaningful disease control rate among patients with well-differentiated, high-grade neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) who were treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE (Lutathera), according to study results presented at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.

In an interview with CancerNetwork®, Kelley Lauren Coffman, MD, a hospitalist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, spoke about the results of the study and the toxicities she and her colleagues observed during the trial.

Transcription:

In the predominant results, we saw that there was good benefit in terms of disease stability from the treatment. About 63% of patients had a partial response to the therapy after completing 4 cycles, about 6% had stable disease, and unfortunately about a third of the patients, about 31%, did progress.

The other notable results were the toxicities. It was consistent with what was seen in the earlier trials, where the primary toxicity was bone marrow suppression and [aspartate aminotransferase; AST]/[alanine aminotransferase; ALT] elevation. But the severity in our patient population was not quite that high. We didn’t really see any grade 3 or grade 4 toxicities.

Reference:

Coffman KL, Bodei L, Le T, et al. Treatment response and clinical outcomes of well-differentiated high-grade neuroendocrine tumors to 177Lu-DOTATATE. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 3). Abstract #: 368.

Recent Videos
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Using bispecific antibodies before or after CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma is an area of education for community oncologists.
Bulkiness of disease did not appear to impact PFS outcomes with ibrutinib plus venetoclax in the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study.
Optimal cancer survivorship care may entail collaboration between a treating oncologist and a cancer survivorship expert.
Related Content