Kevin Kalinsky, MD, MS, on Implications of the Phase 3 RxPONDER Trial in Breast Cancer

Article

The breast medical oncologist and researcher discussed how the addition of chemotherapy to endocrine therapy showed clinical benefit in premenopausal, lymph node-positive, HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.

A study presented at the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium found that menopausal status may determine clinical benefit from the addition of chemotherapy to endocrine therapy in women with hormone receptor (HR)–positive, HER2-negative, lymph node–positive breast cancer and a recurrence score between 0 and 25.

Kevin Kalinsky, MD, MS, acting associate professor in the Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology at Emory University School of Medicine; director of the Glenn Family Breast Center and director of breast medical oncology at Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, spoke to CancerNetwork about the trial results and their implications.

Transcription:

So, I think that this study is practice changing. And I think that for the postmenopausal group, when you look at two-thirds of the population, when you look at those curves, they fully overlap. There was a hazard ratio of 0.97 and those curves look exactly the same. And there was no benefit even when we did a forest plot of any subgroups and postmenopausal women who are benefiting from chemo. So, for the postmenopausal group, you know, that spares thousands of women, the cost and the toxicity, and all the other issues that can be associated with getting chemotherapy.

Now in the premenopausal group, there was a statistically significant improvement within invasive disease-free survival and also a 1.3% absolute improvement in survival in the group that were randomized to chemotherapy. So you know, that has huge implications for when we sit down with our patients, and we explain to them, “Well, listen, these are the benefits and these are the risks.” This study helps inform those discussions.

Recent Videos
Developing odronextamab combinations following CAR T-cell therapy failure may help elicit responses in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Using bispecific antibodies before or after CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma is an area of education for community oncologists.
Bulkiness of disease did not appear to impact PFS outcomes with ibrutinib plus venetoclax in the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study.
Related Content