Lower-Risk Myelofibrosis Population Has High Disease Progression Rate

News
Article

The rate of disease progression among patients with low- or intermediate-risk myelofibrosis appeared to increase over time in the MOST study.

The median time to meeting criteria for first and second disease progression in cohort A was approximately 2 years for each (24.9 vs 28.2 months), whereas it was approximately 1 year (11.6 months) for reaching the third progression criteria.

The median time to meeting criteria for first and second disease progression in cohort A was approximately 2 years for each (24.9 vs 28.2 months), whereas it was approximately 1 year (11.6 months) for reaching the third progression criteria.

Disease progression occurred in a majority of patients with low- or intermediate-risk myelofibrosis, according to data from the prospective MOST study (NCT02953704) presented as a poster at the 2024 European Hematology Association (EHA) Congress.

A total of 232 patients with MF were enrolled, with 205 patients considered low or INT-1 risk due to being aged over 65 years alone comprising cohort A and 27 patients considered low or INT-1 risk for factors other than age only being evaluated in cohort B. In cohort A, 58.5% (n = 120) of patients experienced disease progression during the study, with the most common progression criteria being hemoglobin below 10 g/dL (47.5%). Further, 12 patients (10.0%) died due to disease progression and 6 (5%) had leukemic transformation. In cohort B, 29.6% (n = 8) of patients had disease progression during the course of the study.

Laboratory-defined criteria for progression in the MOST study included hemoglobin below 10 g/dL, platelet count below 100 × 109/L, less than 1% blasts, white blood cell count above 25 × 109/L, and leukemic transformation with greater than 20% blasts. Physician-reported criteria for progression were constitutional symptoms (weight loss, fever, sweats), new or worsening splenomegaly, 1 red blood cell transfusion during the study, physician-reported leukemic transformation, and death due to disease progression. The presence of at least 1 criterion was considered disease progression.

Other progression criteria met in cohort A included a platelet count below 10 × 109/L in 31.7%, constitutional symptoms in 30.8%, and splenomegaly in 28.3%. Hemoglobin below 10 g/dL was present in 21 of 29 patients (72.4%) of those who had 3 or more progression criteria.

Importantly, the rate of progression appeared to increase over the course of the study. The median time to meeting criteria for first and second disease progression in cohort A was approximately 2 years for each (24.9 vs 28.2 months), whereas it was approximately 1 year (11.6 months) for reaching the third progression criteria.

Looking at patients with vs without progression during the study, in cohort A, more patients were over 65 at the time of diagnosis (53.3% vs 35.3%, P =.0384). However, the median time from diagnosis to enrollment was similar between the groups, with a median of 1.9 vs 1.4 years (P = .9997). There was also not a significant difference in the median duration of enrollment for patients in cohort A with or without disease progression (4.5 vs 4.3 years). Most patients in cohort A were receiving MF-directed therapy at the time of enrollment regardless of whether they experienced disease progression (59.2% vs 61.2%); however, more patients with progression were receiving ruxolitinib (Jakafi; 59.2% vs 14.1%, P = .0078), and fewer patients with progression were receiving hydroxyurea (22.5% vs 36.5%, P = .0913). In cohort B, the median time from diagnosis to enrollment was 1.9 years (range, 0-31), and the median duration of enrollment was 4.3 years (range, 3.6-5.4).

Of all patients enrolled in both cohorts, 186 were tested for at least 1 known driver mutation. In cohort A, 108 of 158 had a JAK2 mutation, and 66 of 93 patients had disease progression whereas 42 of 65 without progression had the JAK2 mutation. Of those evaluated for CALR mutation, 33 of 44 had a mutation with 16 of the 21 with disease progression having it and 17 of the 23 without progression having the mutation present. Five out of 31 had an MPL mutation, with 1 out of 6 having the mutation among those who experienced disease progression and 2 of 10 having it among those who did not experience disease progression.

Reference

Grunwald M, Gerds A, Agrawal A, et al. High rate of disease progression in patients with low-risk myelofibrosis (MF) enrolled in the prospective MOST study. Presented at: 2024 European Hematology Association Congress; June 13-16, 2024; Madrid, Spain. Abstract P1053.

Recent Videos
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Using bispecific antibodies before or after CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma is an area of education for community oncologists.
Bulkiness of disease did not appear to impact PFS outcomes with ibrutinib plus venetoclax in the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study.
Optimal cancer survivorship care may entail collaboration between a treating oncologist and a cancer survivorship expert.
Related Content