Maintenance Lenalidomide Delayed Progression After R-CHOP for DLBCL

News
Article

Maintenance lenalidomide significantly prolonged progression-free survival in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who responded to first-line R-CHOP.

Maintenance treatment with lenalidomide significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who responded to first-line treatment with R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), according to phase III study results published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

“To our knowledge, the REMARC study is the first phase III trial evaluating a maintenance strategy in DLBCL to show a benefit in PFS,” wrote study researcher Catherine Thieblemont, MD, PhD, of Hôpital Saint-Louis in Paris, and colleagues. “None of the previously reported trials adding a novel drug to R-CHOP, either in combination during induction (such as with bevacizumab) or after R-CHOP as maintenance (as with rituximab, enzastaurin, or everolimus) have achieved such a benefit.”

The study enrolled 650 patients age 60 to 80 years with previously untreated DLBCL or other aggressive B-cell lymphomas. All patients had achieved a complete or partial response after 6 to 8 cycles of R-CHOP. The patients were randomly assigned to lenalidomide maintenance 25 mg per day or placebo for 21 days of every 28-day cycle for 24 months.

Among patients assigned to lenalidomide, 61% prematurely discontinued treatment; 41% of patients assigned placebo prematurely discontinued treatment.

With a median follow-up of 39 months, a median PFS was not yet reached in patients assigned to maintenance lenalidomide compared with an estimated 58.9 months for placebo (P = .01). The researchers analyzed the effect of maintenance lenalidomide in a series of subgroups and found that the benefit to PFS was consistent in men vs women, age-adjusted International Prognostic Index of 0 or 1 vs 2 or 3, and age younger than 70 vs 70 or older. A median overall survival was not yet reached in either group.

An analysis according to cell of origin showed that only patients with a germinal center B-cell–like profile had a significant difference in median PFS in favor of lenalidomide compared with placebo (60.9 vs 52.7 months; P = .04).

About one-third of patients (33%) assigned to lenalidomide converted from partial to complete response during the maintenance period compared with 29% of patients in the placebo group. The median time to conversion was about 6 months in both groups. According to the researchers, this conversion time may suggest “that induction treatment may be more responsible for this conversion than the maintenance treatment.”

The most commonly observed grade 3/4 adverse events associated with lenalidomide vs placebo maintenance were neutropenia (56% vs 22%) and cutaneous reactions (5% vs 1%).

“It will be important in REMARC to identify any reliably predictive biomarkers to understand the effect of lenalidomide and better use this drug in routine treatment of aggressive B-cell lymphoma, including DLBCL, follicular lymphoma grade 3B, and transformed indolent lymphoma,” the researchers concluded.

Recent Videos
Preliminary phase 2 trial data show durvalumab plus lenalidomide was superior to durvalumab alone in refractory/advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Developing odronextamab combinations following CAR T-cell therapy failure may help elicit responses in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Investigators are currently evaluating mosunetuzumab in relapsed disease or comparing it with rituximab in treatment-naïve follicular lymphoma.
Greater direct access to academic oncologists may help address challenges associated with a lack of CAR T education in the community setting.
Certain bridging therapies and abundant steroid use may complicate the T-cell collection process during CAR T therapy.
Educating community practices on CAR T referral and sequencing treatment strategies may help increase CAR T utilization.
Related Content