No Advantage to Extended-Field Irradiation in Advanced HD

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 8 No 8
Volume 8
Issue 8

LUGANO, Switzerland-The impact of radiotherapy on disease control and toxicity in patients with advanced Hodgkin’s disease remains controversial. In fact, a 1998 meta-analysis suggested that combined-modality therapy results in worse long-term survival than does chemotherapy alone.

LUGANO, Switzerland—The impact of radiotherapy on disease control and toxicity in patients with advanced Hodgkin’s disease remains controversial. In fact, a 1998 meta-analysis suggested that combined-modality therapy results in worse long-term survival than does chemotherapy alone.

Now, preliminary results from a randomized multicenter study performed by the French Adult Lymphoma Study Group (GELA) confirm that extended-field irradiation confers no additional survival advantage over chemotherapy by itself. The trial results were reported at the VII International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma.

The GELA investigators randomly assigned 559 patients with untreated stage IIIB/IV Hodgkin’s disease to receive, as induction chemotherapy, six cycles of either ABVPP (Adriamycin [doxorubicin], bleomycin, vinblastine, procarba-zine, and prednisone) or a MOPP/ABV hybrid (mechlorethamine, Oncovin [vincristine], procarbazine, and prednisone plus Adriamycin, bleomycin, vindesine).

Next, the 418 patients who achieved complete or partial remission were randomized to consolidation therapy with either two additional cycles of the same chemotherapy regimen or total nodal irradiation with 30 Gy plus 5 Gy for initially involved areas plus 5 Gy for residual masses.

Intention-to-treat analysis after 48 months of follow-up revealed no significant differences in event-free survival between the two induction regimens or the two consolidation regimens, or among the four treatment groups, observed Christophe Fermé, MD, of the Hematology Institute, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris.

“However,” Dr. Fermé stressed, “overall survival was significantly superior in patients who received ABVPP alone than in those treated with ABVPP plus extended-field irradiation (94% vs 78%).” After ABVPP and radiotherapy, the risk of death was four times higher than after ABVPP alone, he said. In contrast, no survival differences emerged between MOPP/ABV alone and MOPP/ABV followed by radiotherapy.

“These results suggest an interaction between the induction regimen and consolidation regimen,” Dr. Fermé noted.

A Standard Regimen

Interestingly, the number of relapses was higher and the duration of complete response was shorter among patients assigned to chemotherapy alone than among those who received combined-modality therapy. Nonetheless, the results suggested a tendency toward a lower number of deaths attributable to Hodgkin’s disease among patients treated with chemotherapy alone.

“Eight cycles of a conventional-dose doxorubicin-containing regimen can be a standard regimen if a complete response has been achieved after six cycles,” Dr. Fermé advised. Before specific indications for adjuvant radiotherapy can be defined, he said, analyses of fatalities, results of salvage therapy, and long-term toxicity will be necessary.

Recent Videos
Brett L. Ecker, MD, focused on the use of de-escalation therapy, which is gaining momentum in neuroendocrine tumors.
Immunotherapy options like CAR T-cell therapy and antigen-presenting cell-directed agents are currently being evaluated in the pancreatic cancer field.
Certain bridging therapies and abundant steroid use may complicate the T-cell collection process during CAR T therapy.
Pancreatic cancer is projected to become the second-leading cause of cancer-related deaths by 2030 in the United States.
2 experts are featured in this video
2 experts are featured in this video
2 experts are featured in this video
4 KOLs are featured in this series.
Related Content