Non-germinal center B-cell-like DLBCL patients derived the most benefit from treatment with the immunochemotherapy regimen R-ACVBP compared with R-CHOP.
Micrograph of DLBCL, lymph node FNA specimen, field stain; source: Nephron, Wikimedia Commons
The added survival benefit in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) when treated with the immunochemotherapy regimen R-ACVBP compared with R-CHOP may be related to the non-germinal center B-cell (GCB)-like subtype, according to the results of a study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Thierry Jo Molina, MD, PhD, Hôpital Universitaire Necker Enfants-Malades, Université Paris Descartes, and colleagues came to this conclusion by conducting a biomarker analysis of patients in the LNH 03-2B trial. Results of the LNH 03-2B trial showed that treatment with R-ACVBP (rituximab, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin, and prednisone) in addition to subsequent consolidation improved survival in patients with low-intermediate risk DLBCL compared to treatment with R-CHOP.
“At a time when ongoing phase III trials are aiming to improve R-CHOP by adding lenalidomide or a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor to the treatment regimen for non-GCB patients, the observation of increased survival in this specific population when using a conventional regimen such as R-ACVBP could offer an attractive comparison,” Molina and colleagues wrote.
The researchers used immunohistochemistry to examine several tumor biomarkers- CD10, BCL6, MUM1, MYC, NCL2, and co-expression of MYC/BCL2-in 329 patients from the LNH 03-2B trial. They also classified 229 tumor samples using the Hans algorithm as GCB (n = 128) or non-GCB (n = 101).
The only significant interaction found between a biomarker and survival was between the Hans algorithm and the treatment arm for progression-free and overall survival. Those patients with non-GCB DLBCL treated with R-CHOP were found to have worse progression-free survival (HR = 3.21; 95% CI, 1.29-8.00) and overall survival (HR = 6.09; 95% CI, 1.37-27.03) compared with patients treated with the R-ACVBP regimen. Progression-free and overall survival were significantly longer in patients with non-GCB DLBCL who were treated with R-ACVBP compared with R-CHOP.
No differences in survival between regimens were found for patients with GCB DLBCL.
“The better survival observed in this study among patients with non-GCB tumors when treated with R-ACVBP compared with R-CHOP suggests that oncogenic events specific to non-GCB tumor cells, the hallmark being nuclear factor-κB activation, can be better targeted with R-ACVBP and a consolidation regimen than with R-CHOP,” the researchers wrote.
Improving Disease Modification and Immune Responses in Myelofibrosis With Pelabresib
November 16th 2024David M. Swoboda, MD, and Andrew Kuykendall, MD, spoke about the current treatment strategies and potential advancements that may improve outcomes such as spleen volume reduction in the myelofibrosis field.