Oral XELOX Regimen Comparable to FOX in Advanced Colorectal Ca, Preliminary Data Show

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 14 No 8
Volume 14
Issue 8

BOLOGNA, ITALY-Preliminaryresults of a small phase II advancedcolorectal cancer trial comparinga protracted fluorouracil

BOLOGNA, ITALY-Preliminaryresults of a small phase II advancedcolorectal cancer trial comparinga protracted fluorouracil(5-FU) infusion plus oxaliplatin(Eloxatin)(FOX) with capecitabine(Xeloda) plus oxaliplatin (XELOX)concluded that the capecitabine combinationhad similar efficacy and tolerability,Andrea Martoni, MD, ofOrsola-Malpighi Hospital in Bologna,Italy reported (abstract 3617).Comparable ActivityThe median time to disease progression(TTP) was 6+ months withFOX vs 8.5+ months with XELOX.Dr. Martoni said that survival data arenot mature, as 56% of patients are stillalive."These results suggest that XELOXhas comparable activity to FOX in firstlinetreatment of advanced colorectalcancer. Toxicity is low and substantiallysimilar in the two arms. Oralcapecitabine combinations could bean acceptable alternative to protracted5-FU infusion regimens," Dr. Martonisaid.Dr. Martoni reported data for 111patients randomized to the two treatmentarms, 101 of whom were evaluablefor response. The median numberof cycles delivered was 6 (1-11) inarm A (FOX) and 6 (1-11) in arm B(XELOX).The objective responses were as follows:Arm A (FOX): complete response(CR) 2%, partial response (PR) 44.1%,stable disease (SD) 24.5%, progressivedisease (PD) 14.3%. Arm B (XELOX):CR 5.8%, PR 34.6%, SD 36.6%, PD17.3%; response rate 44.9% vs 40.3%.The median TTP was 8.5 months withFOX vs 9 months with XELOX.Surgical resection of liver metastasesafter chemotherapy was performedin 4.7% of patients in arm A vs 8.9% ofpatients in arm B. Only two patientsshowed grade 4 toxicity (diarrhea) inarm A (1) and in arm B (1).ToxicityGrade 3 treatment-related toxicitiesin arm A and B were neutropenia(2.4% vs 0), thrombocytopenia (2.4%vs 2.4%), stomatitis (3.8% vs 0), diarrhea(11.8% vs 7.1%), hypertransaminasemia(0 vs 1.8 %), hyperbilirubinemia(1.9% vs 1.8%), andneurotoxicity (15.4% vs 25.5%)."Our preliminary results suggestthat FOX and XELOX, as administeredin this trial, show high activity asfirst-line treatment," Dr. Martoni concluded."Toxicity is low and substantiallysimilar in the two arms," Dr.Martoni said.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Updated results from the BREAKWATER study seemed to be most impactful to the CRC space, according to Michael J. Pishvaian, MD, PhD.
Future research will aim to assess the efficacy of PIPAC-MMC plus systemic therapy vs systemic therapy alone in patients with peritoneal tumors.
Although small incision surgery may serve as a conduit to deliver PIPAC-MMC, it may confer benefits in the staging and treatment of peritoneal tumors.
Patients with peritoneal metastases were historically associated with limited survival and low consideration for clinical trials.
Combining sotorasib with panitumumab may reduce the burden of disease in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer.
Findings from the CodeBreak 300 study have cemented sotorasib/panitumumab as a third-line treatment option for KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer.
Sotorasib plus panitumumab may offer improved survival compared with previously approved treatment options in KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer.
Additional local, regional, or national policy may bolster access to screening for colorectal cancer, according to Aasma Shaukat, MD, MPH.
Additional progression-free survival data from the phase 3 BREAKWATER trial will be presented at future meetings.
Related Content