(P095) Comparison of Toxicity and Treatment Outcomes in HIV-Positive Versus HIV-Negative Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 28 No 1S
Volume 28
Issue 1S

To compare toxicity and treatment outcomes in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive vs HIV-negative patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal who underwent definitive concurrent chemoradiation at a single institution.

Evan C. White, MD, Behnood Khodayari, BS, Kelly T. Erickson, MD, Julie Hwang-Graziano, MD, Winston Lien, MD, Aroor Rao, MD; Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Los Angeles Medical Center

Purpose: To compare toxicity and treatment outcomes in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive vs HIV-negative patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal who underwent definitive concurrent chemoradiation at a single institution.

Materials and Methods: A total of 53 consecutive HIV-positive patients treated between 1987 and 2007 were compared with 205 consecutive HIV-negative patients treated between 2003 and 2007. All patients received radiotherapy at a single regional facility. Median radiation dose was 54 Gy (range: 28–60 Gy). Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of 2 cycles of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (1,000 mg/m2/day on Days 1–4 and 29–32), along with mitomycin C (10 mg/m2) given on Day 1 +/− Day 29). After treatment, patients were closely followed with imaging studies, clinical examinations, and rigid proctoscopies. Outcomes assessed were toxicity rates, progression-free survival (PFS), colostomy-free survival (CFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS).

Results: Median follow-up was 34 months. Compared with HIV-negative patients, HIV-positive patients were younger (median age: 48 yr vs 62 yr) and predominantly male (98% of HIV-positive patients were male vs 22% of HIV-negative patients). Also, 37 (70%) HIV-positive patients were on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), and 26 (65%) had an undetectable viral load at the time of treatment; 36 (72%) had a CD4 count > 200 (mean CD4 count: 455). There were no significant differences in acute or late nonhematologic or hematologic toxicity rates between the two groups. At 3 years, there was no significant difference between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients in regard to PFS (75% vs 76%), CFS (85% vs 85%), or CSS (79% vs 88%; P = .36), respectively. On univariate analysis, there was a trend toward worse OS in HIV-positive patients (72% vs 84% at 3 yr; P = .06). On multivariate analysis, only male gender and stage were predictive of worse survival outcomes. HIV status was not associated with worse outcomes in Cox models.

Conclusions: In the HAART era, HIV-positive patients with anal cancer can undergo standard definitive chemoradiation and expect equivalent toxicity and survival outcomes compared with HIV-negative patients.

Articles in this issue

(P113) Age and Marital Status Are Associated With Choice of Mastectomy in Patients Eligible for Breast Conservation Therapy
(P112) Single-Institution Experience With Intrabeam IORT for Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer
(P110) Breast Cancer Before Age 40: Current Patterns in Clinical Presentation and Local Management
(P111) Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation With Multicatheter High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy: Feasibility and Results in a Private Practice Cohort
(P115) Breast Cancer Laterality Does Not Influence Overall Survival in a Large Modern Cohort: Implications for Radiation-Related Cardiac Mortality
(P117) Anatomical Variations and Radiation Technique for Breast Cancer
(P116) Bilateral Immediate DIEP Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Experience at a Tertiary Care Institution
(P118) Metadherin Overexpression Is Associated With Improved Locoregional Control After Mastectomy
(P119) Effect of Economic Environment on Use of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer
(P120) Immediate Versus Delayed Reconstruction After Mastectomy in the United States Medicare Breast Cancer Patient
(P121) Trend in Age and Racial Disparities in the Receipt of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer: 2004–2009
(P122) Streamlining Referring Physicians Orders With ‘Reflex Testing’ Significantly Decreases Time to Resolution for Abnormal Screening Mammograms
(P123) National Trends in the Local Management of Early-Stage Paget Disease of the Breast
(P124) Effect of Inhomogeneity on Cardiac and Lung Dose in Partial-Breast Irradiation Using HDR Brachytherapy
(P125) Breast Cancer Outcomes With Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy for Residual Disease Burden After Full-Dose Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery Followed by Radiation Treatment
Recent Videos
Preliminary phase 2 trial data show durvalumab plus lenalidomide was superior to durvalumab alone in refractory/advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Performance status, age, and comorbidities may impact benefit seen with immunotherapy vs chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.
Developing odronextamab combinations following CAR T-cell therapy failure may help elicit responses in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Related Content