(P144) Prospective Assessment of Patient-Specific Pulmonary Radiation Pneumonitis

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 28 No 1S
Volume 28
Issue 1S

Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is a significant toxicity following thoracic radiotherapy, with no method to predict individual risk. Our lab had previously shown that pulmonary metabolic response rate (PMRR) is highly predictive of RP in lung cancer. In this prospective study, we used PMRR as a surrogate marker to predict radiation-induced lung toxicity in lung cancer patients receiving thoracic radiotherapy.

Ngoc T. Pham, MD, Dmitriy Meshkov, BS, Richard Castillo, PhD, Edward Castillo, PhD, Samantha Aso, MD, Brian Hobbs, PhD, Thomas M. Guerrero, MD, PhD; University of Texas Health Science Center; UT MD Anderson Cancer Center

Purpose: Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is a significant toxicity following thoracic radiotherapy, with no method to predict individual risk. Our lab had previously shown that pulmonary metabolic response rate (PMRR) is highly predictive of RP in lung cancer. In this prospective study, we used PMRR as a surrogate marker to predict radiation-induced lung toxicity in lung cancer patients receiving thoracic radiotherapy.

Materials and Methods: Forty-one patients receiving thoracic radiation for lung cancer were enrolled in a phase II study. Each patient received respiratory surveys before RT initiation and at each weekly follow-up visit. In addition, patients also received restaging positron emission tomography (PET)/CT imaging 30–60 days after completion of RT. The PMRR was determined from the slope of the normalized standardized uptake value (SUV) vs the dose. Deviation of the dose response from a linear model was tested for each case. St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) was used to monitor pneumonitis toxicity. An increase of respiratory efforts in four different activities compared with baseline was considered to be symptomatic. The follow-up endpoint was 1 year after completion of RT, or death. The demographics, dosimetric factors, and PMRRs were evaluated for correlation with RP.

Results: Thirty-eight patients completed the trial. Two patients did not complete the study, and three patients did not qualify due to a restaging PET of more than 3 months. Mean baseline lung function of all patients was 41.46 on the SGRQ. Twenty-two (58%) patients developed RP. Mean ΔSGRQ score for symptomatic patients was +19.93, and mean ΔSGRQ score for asymptomatic patients was –6.225. No clinical factors (age, tumor size, tumor location, tumor history, or dosimetry parameters) were associated with symptoms. The median PMRR for symptomatic patients was 0.014 (range: 0.002–0.076) and 0.007 for asymptomatic patients (P < .002). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64–0.94), with a PMRR threshold at 0.0108 providing sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 88%.

Conclusions: The radiation dose response on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT imaging exhibited a linear relationship on statistical modeling. Patients who developed symptomatic RP had a significantly higher dose-response slope (PMRR) than asymptomatic patients.

Articles in this issue

(P113) Age and Marital Status Are Associated With Choice of Mastectomy in Patients Eligible for Breast Conservation Therapy
(P112) Single-Institution Experience With Intrabeam IORT for Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer
(P110) Breast Cancer Before Age 40: Current Patterns in Clinical Presentation and Local Management
(P111) Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation With Multicatheter High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy: Feasibility and Results in a Private Practice Cohort
(P115) Breast Cancer Laterality Does Not Influence Overall Survival in a Large Modern Cohort: Implications for Radiation-Related Cardiac Mortality
(P117) Anatomical Variations and Radiation Technique for Breast Cancer
(P116) Bilateral Immediate DIEP Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Experience at a Tertiary Care Institution
(P118) Metadherin Overexpression Is Associated With Improved Locoregional Control After Mastectomy
(P119) Effect of Economic Environment on Use of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer
(P120) Immediate Versus Delayed Reconstruction After Mastectomy in the United States Medicare Breast Cancer Patient
(P121) Trend in Age and Racial Disparities in the Receipt of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer: 2004–2009
(P122) Streamlining Referring Physicians Orders With ‘Reflex Testing’ Significantly Decreases Time to Resolution for Abnormal Screening Mammograms
(P123) National Trends in the Local Management of Early-Stage Paget Disease of the Breast
(P124) Effect of Inhomogeneity on Cardiac and Lung Dose in Partial-Breast Irradiation Using HDR Brachytherapy
(P125) Breast Cancer Outcomes With Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy for Residual Disease Burden After Full-Dose Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery Followed by Radiation Treatment
Recent Videos
Performance status, age, and comorbidities may impact benefit seen with immunotherapy vs chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.
Developing odronextamab combinations following CAR T-cell therapy failure may help elicit responses in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Using bispecific antibodies before or after CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma is an area of education for community oncologists.
Related Content