Pazopanib Efficacy Differs by Sarcoma Subtype in Japanese Study

Article

The tyrosine kinase inhibitor pazopanib appeared to have differing effects among different histologic subtypes of soft-tissue sarcoma, according to a new study conducted in Japan.

The tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) pazopanib appeared to have differing effects among different histologic subtypes of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS), according to a new study conducted in Japan. The trial also revealed some adverse events that had not been of concern in a previous large trial.

“STSs are a rare and heterogeneous group of tumors that include more than 50 histologic types,” wrote study authors led by Tomoki Nakamura, MD, PhD, of Mie University Graduate School of Medicine in Tsu, Japan. As many as 30% of STS patients have a local recurrence, and 38% have clinically detectable metastases. “The development of new systemic treatments for patients with STS has been limited in the past few decades.”

Pazopanib, a TKI with activity against VEGFR-1 and other factors, was approved in the United States and in Japan for treatment of STS in 2012. This was based upon results of the PALETTE trial; the new study’s authors undertook the new post-approval analysis because “the efficacy and safety of pazopanib in Japanese patients with advanced STSs remained to be evaluated in a large-scale cohort.”

The new post-marketing trial included 156 patients with relapsed STS, treated for a median of 28.7 weeks with pazopanib. The results were published online ahead of print in Cancer.

Among 125 evaluable patients, there were 13 partial responses (PRs) to the drug, and 74 had stable disease. Four of 12 alveolar soft part sarcoma had a PR, as did three of 30 undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma patients, two of 18 synovial sarcoma patients, and four of 27 of other histologic types.

The median progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients was 15.4 weeks, and there were substantial differences between histologic types. The median PFS among 33 liposarcoma patients was 8 weeks, compared with 17.7 weeks in non-liposarcoma patients. In undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma patients the median PFS was 15.3 weeks, and in leiomyosarcoma patients it was 18.6 weeks. The median overall survival in the full cohort was 11.2 months, and followed similar patterns according to subtype. In total, 103 patients died of their sarcoma during the trial.

A total of 48 patients experienced a grade 3 or higher adverse events, and the most common such adverse events included hypertension, pneumothorax, and liver disorder. The latter two adverse events, as well as fatigue, were most commonly the cause of treatment discontinuation. The authors noted that the rate of pneumothorax was 9.7% among those with lung metastases, a much higher rate than observed in the PALETTE study (3%).

The authors noted that the trial was still relatively small, and retrospective in nature, limiting the findings. However, they concluded that “pazopanib is a new, tolerable treatment option; however, adverse events, such as pneumothorax and thrombocytopenia, which did not occur frequently in the PALETTE study, should be taken into consideration.”

Recent Videos
Accelerated approval of afami-cel may expand access to therapy for patients who are unable to live near certain treatment centers.
Treatment with afami-cel may offer improved quality of life to patients with metastatic synovial sarcoma compared with continuous chemotherapy.
The difference in adverse effect profiles between sorafenib and nirogacestat may make one treatment more appealing than the other for certain patients with desmoid tumors, says Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
The August CancerNetwork Snap Recap takes a look back at key FDA news updates, as well as expert perspectives on the chemotherapy shortage.
Future developments in the sarcoma space may also involve research on circulating tumor DNA and metabolic therapies, according to Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
Current research in the sarcoma space includes the development of treatment options such as T-cell therapies, and combinations such as TKIs/immunotherapy, according to Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD, states that sitravatinib appears to be active and well tolerated among patients with dedifferentiated or well-differentiated liposarcoma.
Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD, also discusses how the treatment of desmoid tumors has evolved following data supporting the use of sorafenib in this population.
CAR T-cell therapies and immunotherapy agents may offer up new options and even become standard of care in certain sarcoma subtypes.
There are several novel treatments that may be beneficial in several sarcoma subtypes including CAR T-cell therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors, according to Sandra P. D’Angelo, MD.
Related Content