Reid Merryman, MD, on Study Findings Investigating Prognostic Value of ctDNA for Patients with DLBCL

News
Video

Thought leader detailed the findings from an oral presentation investigating patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Reid Merryman, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, spoke with CancerNetwork® about the findings from an oral presentation investigating the prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA among patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) presented at the 2020 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting & Exposition.

Transcription:

What we found is that about a quarter of patients had detectable minimal residual disease [MRD] in their apheresis stem cell product, and those patients had much worse outcomes. The 5-year progression-free survival for that cohort of patients, the MRD-positive patients, was only 13% compared with 52% for MRD-negative patients. And as you would expect, the bad outcomes in those patients were driven by high rates of relapse after transplant. Those patients also had inferior progression-free survival. I think those results suggest that the quarter of patients or so who are MRD positive should receive an alternative treatment because they really don’t do well with autologous stem cell transplantation.

And then the other cohort that we analyzed was patients who had peripheral blood samples collected serially after transplant. And in that sample, we found that a positive MRD assessment in plasma with fairly high sensitivity and specificity could predict patients who were about to relapse with a median lead time of about 2 months. Again, I think one could think about using these data to support a clinical trial where patients have serial samples that have to be fairly frequent, serial samples collected after transplant, with the idea being that you might be able to preemptively treat some of these patients before they have clinical relapse.

Recent Videos
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Investigators are currently evaluating mosunetuzumab in relapsed disease or comparing it with rituximab in treatment-naïve follicular lymphoma.
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Using bispecific antibodies before or after CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma is an area of education for community oncologists.
Bulkiness of disease did not appear to impact PFS outcomes with ibrutinib plus venetoclax in the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study.
Related Content