Salma Jabbour, MD, on the Design of the Ongoing KEYNOTE-799 Study

Video

The KEYNOTE-799 study is evaluating pembrolizumab plus concurrent chemoradiation therapy in patients with unresectable, locally advanced, stage III non–small cell lung cancer.

In an interview with CancerNetwork®, Salma Jabbour, MD, chief of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology at the Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, explained the design of the ongoing KEYNOTE-799 study (NCT03631784) which is evaluating pembrolizumab (Keytruda) plus concurrent chemoradiation therapy in patients with unresectable, locally advanced, stage III non–small cell lung cancer.

Transcription:

KEYNOTE-799 is a phase 2, open-label, non-randomized study which evaluated pembrolizumab with concurrent chemoradiation therapy for stage III unresectable non–small cell lung cancer.

In cohort A, patients received carboplatin, paclitaxel, and pembrolizumab for 1 cycle; followed by concurrent chemoradiation therapy with the same agents of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and pembrolizumab; followed by consolidative pembrolizumab for cycles 4 to 17. And that cohort A consisted [of] patients with both squamous and nonsquamous histology.

Cohort B consisted of patients with only nonsquamous histology and patients received cisplatin, pemetrexed, and pembrolizumab for 1 cycle; followed by concurrent cisplatin, pemetrexed, and pembrolizumab with 60 Gy of radiation therapy daily; followed by consolidative pembrolizumab.

The primary end points of this study were objective response rate [by] blinded independent central review using RECIST 1.1 as well as the rates of grade 3 or higher pneumonitis.

Recent Videos
Future work may focus on determining strategies for protecting the health of patients who undergo surgery during climate disasters.
Findings from the OVARIO study show that patients with HRR–deficient and BRCA-mutated disease benefitted the most from niraparib/bevacizumab maintenance.
A study assessed whether physicians would keep patients who received NSCLC surgery in the hospital longer as an improvisational strategy after wildfires.
Select comorbidities, ECOG status, and the receipt of radiation were among the differences between a real-world cohort and the RUBY trial population.
6 experts are featured in this series.
6 experts are featured in this series.
Related Content