Should IMRT Be the New Standard in Esophageal Cancer?

Video

This video discusses the use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and whether it should be the new standard for treating patients with esophageal cancer.

Most esophageal cancer patients have distal tumors, resulting in vital organs such as the heart and lungs being exposed to substantial doses of radiation therapy.

In this video, Steven H. Lin, MD, PhD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses the use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and whether it should be the new standard for treating patients with esophageal cancer.

IMRT is more advanced, but more costly, than standard 3D radiation.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Those being treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis may not have to experience the complication rates or prolonged recovery associated with surgical options.
For patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, integrating PIPAC into a treatment regimen does not interrupt their systemic therapy.
According to Benjamin J. Golas, MD, PIPAC could be used as a bridging therapy before surgical debulking or between subsequent large surgical operations.
According to Benjamin Golas, MD, PIPAC is emerging as minimally invasive laparoscopic approach for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.
According to Ronan J. Kelly, deciding whether to give nivolumab- or durvalumab-based regimens in gastric cancers may rely on a patient’s frailty.
Five-year follow-up revealed that patients treated with nivolumab vs placebo in the phase 3 CheckMate 577 trial experienced a “doubling” of survival.
Patients treated with nivolumab in the phase 3 CheckMate 577 trial were less likely to experience progression-related treatment discontinuation vs placebo.
Testing a patient’s genetics may influence decisions such as using longer courses of radiotherapy, says Rachit Kumar, MD.
Related Content