Some Sarcomas May Require Long-Term Follow-Up

Article

Although rare, long-term recurrence of soft-tissue sarcoma is possible, and patients with retroperitoneal, very large sarcomas, or high-grade disease should undergo long-term follow-up to detect late disease recurrence.

Chest CT of liposarcoma; source: Kuebi, Wikimedia Commons

Although rare, long-term recurrence of soft-tissue sarcoma is possible, and patients with retroperitoneal, very large sarcomas, or high-grade tumors should undergo long-term follow-up to detect late disease recurrence, according to the results of a European study published in Cancer.

“In addition to current European Society for Medical Oncology recommendations for the first 5 years, we suggest that patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma and patients with high-grade tumors be followed biannually for up to 10 years,” wrote Maud Toulmonde, MD, from the department of medicine, Bergonie Institute, Bordeaux, France, and colleagues.

Data from the study also indicated that patients with grade 1 non-retroperitoneal disease do not need long-term follow-up.

Toulmonde and colleagues conducted this retrospective study to determine if any prognostic factors for late and metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma recurrence could be identified.

“The diversity of soft-tissue sarcoma in terms of anatomic location, histology, and biological behavior makes global analysis inappropriate,” the researchers wrote. “Early diagnosis of local recurrence or metastatic recurrence can lead to aggressive treatments with curative intent and prolonged survival in selected patients.”

The researchers analyzed data from 719 patients from the French Sarcoma Group database who were alive and disease free at least 5 years after initial disease management. They looked at the cumulative probability of late and metastatic disease with death as a competing event. Patients in the study were followed for a median of 9.1 years.

At the time of the analysis, 67 patients (9.3%) had developed late local disease recurrence and 42 patients (5.8%) had developed late metastatic disease recurrence.

Multivariate analysis of the data revealed that internal trunk location (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.9; 95% CI, 2.2-6.7; P < .001) and tumor size larger than 100 mm (HR = 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-4; P = .035) were independently associated with an increased risk for late local recurrence. Late local recurrence occurred in 25% of patients with internal trunk sarcoma and 14% of patients with a tumor larger than 100 mm.

“Retroperitoneal sarcomas share both negative prognostic features for local recurrence,” the researchers wrote. “More specifically, retroperitoneal liposarcomas, especially when well differentiated, can have a very indolent course interspersed with iterative recurrences.”

The likelihood of late metastatic recurrence was independently linked with tumor grade greater than 1 (HR=4.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1; P=.04).

“Although the majority of metastatic recurrences occur within 2 years from the time of the initial diagnosis, the data from the current study indicate that 1 in 14 patients with high-grade soft-tissue sarcoma who was free of recurrence at 5 years developed a late metastatic recurrence,” the researchers wrote. “One mechanism that could explain the late recurrence of high grade, highly proliferating tumors is tumor dormancy.”

Recent Videos
Accelerated approval of afami-cel may expand access to therapy for patients who are unable to live near certain treatment centers.
Treatment with afami-cel may offer improved quality of life to patients with metastatic synovial sarcoma compared with continuous chemotherapy.
The difference in adverse effect profiles between sorafenib and nirogacestat may make one treatment more appealing than the other for certain patients with desmoid tumors, says Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
The August CancerNetwork Snap Recap takes a look back at key FDA news updates, as well as expert perspectives on the chemotherapy shortage.
Future developments in the sarcoma space may also involve research on circulating tumor DNA and metabolic therapies, according to Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
Current research in the sarcoma space includes the development of treatment options such as T-cell therapies, and combinations such as TKIs/immunotherapy, according to Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD, states that sitravatinib appears to be active and well tolerated among patients with dedifferentiated or well-differentiated liposarcoma.
Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD, also discusses how the treatment of desmoid tumors has evolved following data supporting the use of sorafenib in this population.
CAR T-cell therapies and immunotherapy agents may offer up new options and even become standard of care in certain sarcoma subtypes.
There are several novel treatments that may be beneficial in several sarcoma subtypes including CAR T-cell therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors, according to Sandra P. D’Angelo, MD.
Related Content