Sonrotoclax Combo Shows Enduring Responses in Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL

News
Article

Phase 1 data show no dose-limiting toxicities with sonrotoclax plus zanubrutinib for patients with relapsed/refractory CLL or SLL.

"Sonrotoclax, a next-generation BCL-2 inhibitor, [may be] a more selective and pharmacologically potent inhibitor of BCL-2 than venetoclax [Venclexta] with a shorter-half-life and no drug accumulation," according to lead study author Stephen Opat.

"Sonrotoclax, a next-generation BCL-2 inhibitor, [may be] a more selective and pharmacologically potent inhibitor of BCL-2 than venetoclax [Venclexta] with a shorter-half-life and no drug accumulation," according to lead study author Stephen Opat.

Enduring responses and tolerability were reported in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) when combining sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) with zanubrutinib (Brukinsa), according to data form the phase 1 BGB-11417-101 study (NCT04277637) presented at the 2024 European Hematology Association (EHA) Congress.

At a median follow-up of 19.3 months (range, 0.4-35.7), no dose-limiting toxicities occurred with the combination. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached, and 320 mg was chosen as the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of sonrotoclax. Furthermore, the combination elicited a 97% overall response rate (ORR), with a complete response (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate of 57% across all dose levels. In the 320-mg cohort, the ORR was 100%, and the CR/CRi rate was 73%.

“CLL/SLL remains incurable as many treated patients experience relapse, necessitating further treatment with novel agents,” Stephen Opat, lead study author and the director of Clinical Haematology at Monash Health in Melbourne, Australia, said in a presentation. “Sonrotoclax, a next-generation BCL-2 inhibitor, [may be] a more selective and pharmacologically potent inhibitor of BCL-2 than venetoclax [Venclexta] with a shorter-half-life and no drug accumulation. Zanubrutinib is a next-generation BTK inhibitor approved globally for 5 indications, including CLL.”

The ongoing, global BGB-11417-101 trial is evaluating sonrotoclax as monotherapy or in combination with zanubrutinib and/or obinutuzumab (Gazyva) in patients with B-cell malignancies, including relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL, relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma, or treatment-naive CLL/SLL.

The primary end points of the trial are safety per CTCAE v5.0 criteria, as well as the determination of the MTD and RP2D.

In the sonrotoclax plus zanubrutinib dose-finding arm, patients with relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL (n = 47) received 8 to 12 weeks of zanubrutinib lead-in therapy at 320 mg daily or 160 mg twice daily, then zanubrutinib in combination with sonrotoclax with weekly ramp-up to the target dose until disease progression. In the dose-expansion phase, patients received daily or weekly ramp-up to the target sonrotoclax dose of 320 mg. In total, 4, 9, 6, 22, and 6 patients received sonrotoclax at 40 mg, 80 mg, 160 mg, 320 mg, and 640 mg throughout the dose-finding and dose-expansion phases.

Among all patients, the median age was 65 years (range, 36-76), most (75%) were male, and had an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 (60%). Twenty-six percent of evaluable patients had 17p deletions, and 53% had 17p deletions and/or TP53 mutations. Most patients (68%) had unmutated IGHV. Patients had received a median of 1 prior line of therapy (range, 1-3), 15% had received prior BTK inhibitors, and the median duration of prior BTK inhibition was 34.2 months (range, 1.6-86.6).

Among patients who received sonrotoclax at the target dose of 320 mg, the median follow-up was 6.8 months (range, 0.4-26.9), the median age was 67 years (range, 36-76), most were male (82%), and 50% had an ECOG PS of 0. Seventeen percent of evaluable patients had 17p deletions, and 59% had 17p deletions and/or TP53 mutations. Most patients (75%) had unmutated IGHV. Patients had received a median of 1 prior line of therapy (range, 1-3), 14% had received prior BTK inhibitors, and the median duration of prior BTK inhibition was 38.1 months (range, 34.2-49.1).

Among all patients, any-grade treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) occurred in 94%, grade 3 or higher TEAEs occurred in 51%, and serious TEAEs occurred in 28%. Two patients had TEAEs leading to zanubrutinib discontinuation, and 1 patient had TEAEs leading to zanubrutinib dose reduction. In total, 94% of patients received treatment with sonrotoclax. Among these patients, 1 had TEAEs leading to discontinuation of the drug. No patients had TEAEs leading to sonrotoclax dose reduction, and no deaths were observed.

Among the patients who received sonrotoclax at 320 mg, any-grade TEAEs occurred in 91%, grade 3 or higher TEAEs occurred in 59%, and serious TEAEs occurred in 32%. No patients had TEAEs leading to zanubrutinib discontinuation, and 1 patient had TEAEs leading to zanubrutinib dose reduction. In total, 86% of patients received treatment with sonrotoclax at this dose level. Among these patients, none had TEAEs leading to sonrotoclax discontinuation or dose reduction.

The most common TEAEs observed in the entire patient population were contusion (grade 1/2, 32%; grade ≥3, 0%), neutropenia (6%; 21%), COVID-19 (26%; 2%), diarrhea (28%; 0%), fatigue (26%; 0%), nausea (23%; 0%), upper respiratory tract infection (23%; 0%), cough (21%; 0%), constipation (15%; 2%), headache (17%; 0%), hypertension (4%; 9%), back pain (13%; 0%), sinusitis (11%; 0%), thrombocytopenia (11%; 0%). Among the patients who received sonrotoclax at 320 mg, the most common TEAEs were neutropenia (grade 1/2, 5%; grade ≥3, 36%), upper respiratory tract infection (32%; 0%), contusion (23%; 0%), diarrhea (23%; 0%), and constipation (18%; 5%). Overall, no cases of tumor lysis syndrome, atrial fibrillation, febrile neutropenia, or dose reductions due to diarrhea were observed.

Among 33 patients evaluable for minimal residual disease (MRD) status, 85% had undetectable MRD at data cutoff. Opat noted that responses with the combination deepened over time. Among evaluable patients in the 160-mg cohort (n = 6), the best MRD outcomes by week 24 were MRD4-positive (17%), undetectable MRD4 (50%), and not available (NA; 33%). Among evaluable patients in the 320-mg cohort (n = 9), the best MRD outcomes by week 24 of treatment were MRD4-positive (22%), undetectable MRD4 (44%), and not available (NA; 33%). However, by week 48, all patients who received sonrotoclax at 160 mg, 320 mg, and 640 mg who reached week 48 (160-mg cohort, n = 6; 320-mg cohort, n = 5) achieved undetectable MRD.

Overall, 1 progression-free survival event was observed, which occurred in the 40-mg cohort.

Forty-six patients remain on study treatment.

“Follow-up is ongoing with this promising combination therapy,” Opat concluded.

Reference

Opat S, Anderson MA, Tedeschi A, et al. Results from the phase 1 study of the novel BCL2 inhibitor sonrotoclax (sonro) in combination with zanubrutinib (zanu) for relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL/SLL show deep and durable responses. Presented at: 2024 EHA Congress; June 13-16, 2024; Madrid, Spain. Abstract S156.

Recent Videos
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Using bispecific antibodies before or after CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma is an area of education for community oncologists.
Bulkiness of disease did not appear to impact PFS outcomes with ibrutinib plus venetoclax in the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study.
Optimal cancer survivorship care may entail collaboration between a treating oncologist and a cancer survivorship expert.
Related Content