Stephen Schuster, MD, on Prioritizing Patients with Aggressive Lymphomas During COVID-19 Pandemic

News
Article

Stephen Schuster, MD, discussed how they are prioritizing patients with more aggressive lymphomas, with emphasis on tumor volume and serum LDH levels during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Stephen Schuster, MD, discussed how they are prioritizing patients with more aggressive lymphomas, with an emphasis on tumor volume and serum LDH levels during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Transcription:

We’ve gotten very good at assessing risk for not making it to collection. Basically, the 2 primary variables that we found are the tumor volume, the bulk of tumor that a patient has, also the serum LDH which effects the proliferative capacity or growth rate of the tumor. Patients with high serum LDH and high tumor volume are less likely to stay stable. Again, these are all patients that are refractory to existing therapy so it’s hard to keep them stable, although we try some things for so called ‘bridging’: steroids, novel agents, lenalidomide, ibrutinib for some patients, which occasionally will work. In these high volume, very-high risk for rapid progression, in those cases we’ll move those patients ahead as opposed to the patient that’s in a near complete remission with a normal LDH that’s likely to be stable for a week or 2 longer. There, we really have not had any problems by adjusting the collection schedule-that’s usually where it gets adjusted. Who’s in line to have their apheresis performed and their cells collected? That’s where we might adjust and prioritize one patient over another. And we’ve done it a few times, no problems in terms of people not making it to infusion because of a delay in collection, etc.

Recent Videos
Preliminary phase 2 trial data show durvalumab plus lenalidomide was superior to durvalumab alone in refractory/advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Developing odronextamab combinations following CAR T-cell therapy failure may help elicit responses in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Investigators are currently evaluating mosunetuzumab in relapsed disease or comparing it with rituximab in treatment-naïve follicular lymphoma.
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Bulkiness of disease did not appear to impact PFS outcomes with ibrutinib plus venetoclax in the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study.
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Related Content