Stephen Schuster, MD, Talks Adjustments for Treating Patients with Aggressive Lymphomas During COVID-19 Pandemic

News
Article

Stephen Schuster, MD, of Penn Medicine discussed testing for COVID-19, telemedicine and how they are adjusting their treatment of patients with aggressive lymphomas during the pandemic.

Stephen Schuster, MD, of Penn Medicine discussed testing for COVID-19, telemedicine and how they are adjusting their treatment of patients with aggressive lymphomas during the pandemic.

Transcription:

Couple logistic considerations and one is do we test these patients for COVID prior to proceeding? When the pandemic first started, we really were not able to get a test with a rapid turnaround time, so we used clinical criteria to decide whether to proceed: fever, respiratory symptoms, fatigue unrelated to disease, chest CT findings, and made a decision based on those criteria. Now we can get testing in 45 minutes. So, when we do our viral testing, we do a nasal swab prior to proceeding within a week of proceeding we test for COVID at the same time. So, that part has become easy and we haven’t had any people that have tested positive that we have not been able to proceed with.

 

The other thing I might mention with regard to how it’s influenced our practice is once patients are beyond the critical first two weeks, we do many of the assessments remotely through telemedicine. [We] interview the patients with the caretaker and we get local labs often drawn at home and we can do the visits virtually. If there’s an issue of course they come in and we see them. So, we do see patients in clinic, but we try not to bring patients to clinic unless there’s a real need.

Recent Videos
Developing odronextamab combinations following CAR T-cell therapy failure may help elicit responses in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Investigators are currently evaluating mosunetuzumab in relapsed disease or comparing it with rituximab in treatment-naïve follicular lymphoma.
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Bulkiness of disease did not appear to impact PFS outcomes with ibrutinib plus venetoclax in the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study.
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Establishment of an AYA Lymphoma Consortium has facilitated a process to better understand and address gaps in knowledge for this patient group.
Adult and pediatric oncology collaboration in assessing nivolumab in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma facilitated the phase 3 SWOG S1826 findings.
Treatment paradigms differ between adult and pediatric oncologists when treating young adults with lymphoma.
Related Content