T-Cell Therapy With Fludarabine Active in Synovial Sarcoma

Article

NY-ESO-1 SPEAR T-cell therapy showed promising results and was reasonably safe in patients with synovial sarcoma, according to a new study. The addition of fludarabine may be important to achieving those positive results.

NY-ESO-1 SPEAR T-cell therapy showed promising results and was reasonably safe in patients with synovial sarcoma, according to a new study. The use of multiple cohorts with variations on the treatment showed that the addition of fludarabine may be important to achieving those positive results.

Outcomes are generally poor with synovial sarcoma, “highlighting the need for more novel and effective therapies,” said Sandra P. D’Angelo, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York. She presented results of a study of specific peptide enhanced affinity receptor (SPEAR) T cells that recognize an NY-ESO-1 derived peptide at the Connective Tissue Oncology Society (CTOS) 2017 Annual Meeting, held November 8–11 in Wailea, Hawaii.

The treatment involves the harvesting of lymphocytes by leukapheresis; the cells are then isolated, activated, transduced in order to express NY-ESO-1c259T, and expanded before being infused following lymphodepletion. The study included 46 patients across four cohorts with different lymphodepletion regimens. Patients in cohort 1 had high NY-ESO-1 expression, and received fludarabine and cyclophosphamide; cohort 2 had low expression and received the same regimen. Cohort 3 had high expression of NY-ESO-1 and received only cyclophosphamide, while cohort 4 had high expression and received fludarabine plus a lower dose of cyclophosphamide.

A total of 37 of the 46 patients received cell infusion. The median age across the cohorts was 33 years, and most patients had received at least two prior lines of chemotherapy. The median number of transduced cells was 2.7 × 109.

The response rate (confirmed complete response plus partial responses) was 50% in cohort 1, with one complete response and five partial responses, as well as six patients with stable disease. The rate was poorer in the low-expression cohort 2, at 22%. Only one response was seen in cohort 3, where fludarabine was not used, for a response rate of 20%. Cohort 4 had three partial responses, for a rate of 27%.

The median response duration was 30.9 weeks in cohort 1, compared with only 8.4 weeks in cohort 2. In cohort 3 it was 32 weeks, and in cohort 4 it was 14 weeks. The median progression-free survival was 15 weeks in cohort 1, 13 weeks in cohort 2, 12 weeks in cohort 3, and 23 weeks in cohort 4.

“All patients experienced adverse events, and all were treatment-related,” D’Angelo said. Among the grade 3 or higher adverse events seen in more than 10% of patients were leucopenia, lymphopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Cytokine release syndrome was reported in 16 patients, and 4 were grade 3 or higher. All events resolved with supportive care.

“Fludarabine appears to be required for optimal efficacy,” D’Angelo said, adding that one challenge moving ahead is to find the most appropriate chemotherapy regimen to go along with infused T cells. “There are ongoing efforts to understand mechanisms of resistance, as well as sensitivity,” she concluded.

Recent Videos
Accelerated approval of afami-cel may expand access to therapy for patients who are unable to live near certain treatment centers.
Treatment with afami-cel may offer improved quality of life to patients with metastatic synovial sarcoma compared with continuous chemotherapy.
The difference in adverse effect profiles between sorafenib and nirogacestat may make one treatment more appealing than the other for certain patients with desmoid tumors, says Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
The August CancerNetwork Snap Recap takes a look back at key FDA news updates, as well as expert perspectives on the chemotherapy shortage.
Future developments in the sarcoma space may also involve research on circulating tumor DNA and metabolic therapies, according to Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
Current research in the sarcoma space includes the development of treatment options such as T-cell therapies, and combinations such as TKIs/immunotherapy, according to Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD, states that sitravatinib appears to be active and well tolerated among patients with dedifferentiated or well-differentiated liposarcoma.
Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD, also discusses how the treatment of desmoid tumors has evolved following data supporting the use of sorafenib in this population.
CAR T-cell therapies and immunotherapy agents may offer up new options and even become standard of care in certain sarcoma subtypes.
There are several novel treatments that may be beneficial in several sarcoma subtypes including CAR T-cell therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors, according to Sandra P. D’Angelo, MD.
Related Content