Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, on Genomic Drivers in Cholangiocarcinoma at ASCO 2021

Video

At the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® spoke with Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, about genomic drivers in cholangiocarcinoma.

At the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® spoke with Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, about genomic drivers in cholangiocarcinoma. Notably, cholangiocarcinoma is a genomically diverse disease, with 2 main drivers that have current FDA-approved targeted agents.

Transcript:

Biliary tract cancers are very interesting, especially intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; we are seeing more of this strictly [in] extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [and] even gallbladder. This disease is so anatomically diverse, but also genomically very diverse. We just recently started to break down the disease by site [and], more importantly, by genomic driver. In intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, there are 2 main drivers that we know of that now have either a drug [approval] or [one that is] on its way to possibly being approved.

For FGFR fusions, we know now that we have 2 agents approved. That [represents] about 10% to 15% of all patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. To put that again in perspective, we are talking about 3000 to 5000 patients a year in the United States. That is a rare patient population that we are splitting into pieces. The FGFR-targeted agents are pemigatinib [Pemazyre] and infigratinib [(Truseltiq); those are the 2 drugs] approved for that space. Now, it turns out that there is another target that is very interesting, [which] is essentially an IDH mutation. Without really going through a lot of the biology, IDH1/2 is a key enzyme in cellular metabolism epigenetic regulation.

Reference

Makawita S, Borad MJ, Carapeto F, et al. IDH1 and IDH2 driven intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC): a comprehensive genomic and immune profiling study. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 15):4009. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.4009

Recent Videos
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Using bispecific antibodies before or after CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma is an area of education for community oncologists.
Bulkiness of disease did not appear to impact PFS outcomes with ibrutinib plus venetoclax in the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study.
Optimal cancer survivorship care may entail collaboration between a treating oncologist and a cancer survivorship expert.
Related Content