Targeted Axillary Dissection Improves False Negative Rates for Residual Nodal Disease

Article

Targeted axillary dissection improves axillary staging and pathologic evaluation of residual nodal involvement after chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer.

Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) improves axillary staging and pathologic evaluation of residual nodal involvement after chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer, reported Henry M. Kuerer, MD, PhD, CMQ, of the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas, at the 33rd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference, held March 10–13 in Miami Beach, Florida.[1]

TAD involves marking biopsy-confirmed metastatic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) with clips so that selected nodes can be removed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pathologic evaluation of residual nodal involvement. It is an alternative to complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), which increases the risk of lymphedema, and traditional SLN dissection (SLND), which can miss residual disease.

“Ensuring removal of the node with biopsy-proven metastatic disease after [neoadjuvant chemotherapy] is a more accurate method to stage the axilla compared with SLN alone,” Dr. Kuerer reported. “Outcome studies of TAD alone among patients with nodal [pathologic complete response] are underway.”

To determine whether or not identification and removal of the clipped node with biopsy-proven metastasis prior to chemotherapy improves the accuracy of SLND after preoperative chemotherapy, Dr. Kuerer and colleagues enrolled 208 patients, and conducted routine ALND and SLND after marker clips had been placed in SLNs with metastasis, after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Dr. Kuerer explained.

“We found that placing a radioactive [I125] seed 1 to 5 days within the lymph node helped us to remove it,” he said. The seeds do not interfere with Tc-99m lymphoscintigraphy, he noted.

The clipped nodes were not retrieved as SLNs in 23% of cases, but this was unrelated to the presence or absence of residual disease, he reported. TAD followed by ALND identified a false negative rate (missed residual disease) of just 2%, compared to 10.1% in patients undergoing SLND and ALND without TAD.

References:

1. Caudle AS, Yang WT, Krishnamurthy S , et al. Improved Axillary Evaluation Following Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer Using Selective Evaluation of Clipped Nodes: Implementation of Targeted Axillary Dissection. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan 25. [Epub ahead of print]

Recent Videos
Preliminary phase 2 trial data show durvalumab plus lenalidomide was superior to durvalumab alone in refractory/advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Performance status, age, and comorbidities may impact benefit seen with immunotherapy vs chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.
Developing odronextamab combinations following CAR T-cell therapy failure may help elicit responses in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Related Content