TEXT/SOFT Trials: Analysis of Ovarian Suppression in Breast Cancer

Video

Dr. Pagani, who presented data on the joint analysis of the IBCSG TEXT and SOFT trials at the 2014 ASCO Annual Meeting, discusses how breast cancer patients in these trials responded to different methods of ovarian suppression.

Dr. Pagani, director of the breast unit at the Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, presented data on the joint analysis of the IBCSG TEXT and SOFT trials during the Plenary Session at the 2014 ASCO Annual Meeting.

Here she discusses how breast cancer patients in these trials responded to different methods of ovarian suppression, the pros and cons for each of the methods used in the two trials and the resulting side effects, as well as her thoughts on whether the increase in cancer-free survival seen with aromatase inhibitors plus ovarian suppression will result in payers being willing to reimburse for it.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
“If you have a [patient in the] fourth or fifth line, [JNJ-5322] could be a valid drug of choice,” said Rakesh Popat, BSc, MBBS, MRCP, FRCPath, PhD.
Earlier treatment with daratumumab may be better tolerated for patients with pretreated MRD-negative multiple myeloma.
The trispecific antibody JNJ-5322 demonstrated superior efficacy vs approved agents in multiple myeloma in results shared at the 2025 EHA Congress.
Despite CD19 CAR T-cell therapy exhibiting efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma, less than half achieve long-term remission.
Current findings from the phase 1/2 CaDAnCe-101 trial show no predictive factors of improved responses with BGB-16673 in patients with CLL or SLL.
Related Content