Trastuzumab Deruxtecan Improves Survival in HER-2 Positive Breast Cancer Compared to Capecitabine Regimens

Article

Patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer had improved progression-free and overall survival when treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan compared with capecitabin-based treatment, according to recent findings.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) led to a 34% reduction in death and a 13-month increase in overall survival (OS) for patients with advanced HER2-positive unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1; Kadcyla) compared to treatment of physician’s choice (TPC), according to results found from the phase 3 DESTINY-Breast02 trial (NCT03523585).

These results, which were presented at the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS), are consistent with findings from the 2019 phase 2 DESTINY-Breast01 trial (NCT03248492), which demonstrated T-DXd as a viable treatment for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and led to the accelerated approval of T-DXd for patients with metastatic or unresectable breast cancer.


“(The findings from) the phase 3 DESTINY-Breast02 trial demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in both progression-free and overall survival compared to treatment of physicians choice in the post-T-DM1 setting,” study author Ian Krop, MD, PhD, a chief clinical research officer at the Yale Cancer Center, said in a presentation of this data. “DESTINY-Breast02 confirms the favorable benefit-risk ratio of T-DXd in patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer.”


In the trial, 608 patients with metastatic breast cancer who had previously received 2 lines of T-DM1 treatment were randomized to receive either T-DXd (n = 406) or a physician-recommended combination of capecitabine with either trastuzumab (Herceptin) or lapatinib (Tykerb; n= 202).

The patients who received T-Dxd had a median age of 54.2 years and a median treatment time of 11.3 months. The patients who received TPC had a median age of 54.7 years and a median treatment time of approximately 4.5 months.

The objective response rate for the T-DXd arm was 69.7%, compared to 29.2% in the TPC arm.


Krop also explained that the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 17.8 months for patients with T-DXd while it was 6.9 months for patients with TPC (HR, 0.3589), demonstrating a 64% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death.

Krop also shared that 42% of patients who received T-DXd were progression-free after two years, compared to 13.9% for the patients who received TPC.

After one year, 89.4% of patients who received T-DXd were alive, compared with 74.7% of patients who received TPC.


Regarding OS, median OS was 39.2 months and 26.5 months in the T-DXd and TPC arms, respectively (HR,0.66), indicating a 34% reduction in the risk of death with T-DXd compared to TPC.


Krop also shared that the percentage of patients who had to discontinue therapy because of an adverse reaction to the drug was 14% with T-Dxd versus 5% with TPC. He noted that most of these patients had to discontinue due to interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis.

Krop emphasized that even though this trial studied T-DXd as the third line of therapy, these results should not be used to change any current practices of using T-DXd as a second-line of therapy because oncologists “generally don’t hold back” the superior therapy for patients with cancer.

“T-DXd should still be used in the second line setting in virtually all patients (with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer),” he concluded.


Reference

Krop, Ian et al T-DXd yields superior outcomes over chemotherapy-based regimens in patients previously treated with T-DM1 participating in the phase III DESTINY-Breast02 trial. Presented at: 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; December 6-10, 2022; San Antonio, TX. Abstract GS2-01.

Recent Videos
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Using bispecific antibodies before or after CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma is an area of education for community oncologists.
Bulkiness of disease did not appear to impact PFS outcomes with ibrutinib plus venetoclax in the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study.
Optimal cancer survivorship care may entail collaboration between a treating oncologist and a cancer survivorship expert.
Related Content