Tumor Markers, MoAbs May Help Individualize Colon Cancer Therapy

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 6 No 9
Volume 6
Issue 9

PHILADELPHIA-Biologic tumor markers, in combination with the Duke’s anatomic staging system, may point the way toward the individualization of colo-rectal cancer treatment, says Daniel G. Haller, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center.

PHILADELPHIA—Biologic tumor markers, in combination with the Duke’s anatomic staging system, may point the way toward the individualization of colo-rectal cancer treatment, says Daniel G. Haller, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center.

Treatment would be at an appropriate level of intensity based on the patient’s specific risk and individual situation, Dr. Haller said. “I think it’s time every 50 years to reinvent how you treat patients,” he added.

Potentially predictive tumor-associated variables include mutations in chromosome 18, gene deletions, and thy-midylate synthase (TS) levels.

High TS Predicts Worse Outcome

In a presentation at Fox Chase Cancer Center’s annual Toward 2000 Symposium, Dr. Haller noted that high TS levels predicted a worse outcome in retrospective studies of rectal cancer conducted by the NSABP, but those same patients were the ones apparently most sensitive to chemotherapy.

“I think we need to look at treatment sensitivity as well as tumor biology, two very different aspects of the disease,” he commented.

One particularly novel agent under study for colorectal cancer is a humanized murine monoclonal antibody, known as 17-1A, that recognizes a cell surface glycoprotein and can induce antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in laboratory systems.

Dr. Haller said that the antibody has been tested in Germany in patients with stage III colorectal cancer, and that two more trials are now under way comparing 17-1A with standard colorectal cancer treatments.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Updated results from the BREAKWATER study seemed to be most impactful to the CRC space, according to Michael J. Pishvaian, MD, PhD.
Providing easier access to ancillary services for patients with PDAC who live farther away from the treatment center may help them complete the treatment regimen.
Future research will aim to assess the efficacy of PIPAC-MMC plus systemic therapy vs systemic therapy alone in patients with peritoneal tumors.
Although small incision surgery may serve as a conduit to deliver PIPAC-MMC, it may confer benefits in the staging and treatment of peritoneal tumors.
Patients with peritoneal metastases were historically associated with limited survival and low consideration for clinical trials.
Prolonging systemic therapy in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancers may offer better outcomes than radiation therapy.
Related Content