UFT/Leucovorin: An ‘Excellent Alternative’ to 5-FU/Leucovorin in Colorectal Cancer

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 14 No 8
Volume 14
Issue 8

NEW YORK-The combinationof UFT (an oral fluoropyrimidineconsisting of tegafur plus uracil) andleucovorin “is tolerable and efficacious”and “an excellent alternative to

NEW YORK-The combinationof UFT (an oral fluoropyrimidineconsisting of tegafur plus uracil) andleucovorin "is tolerable and efficacious"and "an excellent alternative tofluorouracil/leucovorin, according tothe results of a phase II multicentertrial (abstract 3608). "Prolonged administrationof UFT/leucovorin has asimilar toxicity profile to infusional 5-FU," the investigators concluded. Theyalso noted that UFT/leucovorin "comparesfavorably with other oral fluoropyrimidines"and saw "no disadvantagein treating the very elderly" (olderthan age 75).The principal toxicities were diarrheaand neutropenia. Grade 3/4 diarrheaoccurred in 23% of patients andgrade 3/4 neutropenia, in 5%. Othertoxicities included fatigue in 14.3%and nausea (but no grade 4 events) in10.7%. No cases of hand-foot syndromewere observed.Treatment Every 8 HoursA total of 58 patients were enrolledin the Eastern Cooperative OncologyGroup (ECOG) study 1299. The medianage of patients was 81 years (range75-90 years). Performance status was0 for 14 patients (24%), 1 for 31 patients(56%), and 2 for 13 patients(20%). Patients had undergone noprior chemotherapy for metastaticdisease, but 13 patients had undergoneprior adjuvant chemotherapy.

Treatment was administered asUFT (300 mg/m2) plus leucovorin (30mg) every 8 hours for 28 days, with 7days of rest. CT scans were performedevery 2 weeks.Similar Results toSingle-Agent 5-FUAccording to updated data presentedby Elizabeta C. Popa, MD, of NewYork University Cancer Institute, thebest confirmed responses among the55 treated patients were a completeresponse in 1 patient and a partialresponse in 11 patients. Eighteen patientshad stable disease and 16 hadprogressive disease. Nine patients werenot evaluable (Table 1).Results are similar to the 22% responserate and 13-month median survivalreported for single-agent 5-FU."Phase III studies comparing bolus IV5-FU and oral UFT/leucovorin haveshown similar response rates and survivaloutcomes to our study," Dr. Popaadded.The investigators said that additionalstudies comparing infusional 5-FU with oral UFT/leucovorin, as wellas phase II studies using UFT/leucovorinin combination with newer agents,such as oxaliplatin (Eloxatin), irinotecan(Camptosar), and biologics, "arewarranted to establish maximal utilityof this oral fluoropyrimidine."

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Updated results from the BREAKWATER study seemed to be most impactful to the CRC space, according to Michael J. Pishvaian, MD, PhD.
Future research will aim to assess the efficacy of PIPAC-MMC plus systemic therapy vs systemic therapy alone in patients with peritoneal tumors.
Although small incision surgery may serve as a conduit to deliver PIPAC-MMC, it may confer benefits in the staging and treatment of peritoneal tumors.
Patients with peritoneal metastases were historically associated with limited survival and low consideration for clinical trials.
Combining sotorasib with panitumumab may reduce the burden of disease in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer.
Findings from the CodeBreak 300 study have cemented sotorasib/panitumumab as a third-line treatment option for KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer.
Sotorasib plus panitumumab may offer improved survival compared with previously approved treatment options in KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer.
Additional local, regional, or national policy may bolster access to screening for colorectal cancer, according to Aasma Shaukat, MD, MPH.
Additional progression-free survival data from the phase 3 BREAKWATER trial will be presented at future meetings.
Related Content