Younger DCIS Patients Face Higher Recurrence Risk After Breast-Conserving Surgery

Article

Following breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), younger women face a higher risk than older patients for recurrence of both DCIS and invasive carcinomas.

Following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), younger women face a higher risk than older patients for recurrence of both DCIS and invasive carcinomas, reported Kimberly Van Zee, MD, FACS, a surgical oncologist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, at the 33rd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference, held March 10–13 in Miami Beach, Florida.

“Young age (younger than age 40 years at diagnosis) is a highly significant risk factor for any recurrence after BCS for DCIS,” Dr. Van Zee said, during her review of the available research.

Ten-year recurrence rates of 27.3% for women younger than 40 vs 7.5% among women 80 or older,” she said. “This age effect persists even after adjusting for other factors that vary by age.”

“Older age was associated with lower recurrence in both cohorts that did and did not receive radiation,” she added.

Women younger than 40 years face a seven-fold higher risk of invasive recurrence than do women age 80 or older at the time of DCIS diagnosis.

“In women younger than 40 years, invasive recurrences are more likely than DCIS recurrences,” she noted, whereas DCIS recurrences are more common in women age 40 or older.

“Age is an important factor that should be considered in weighing the various treatment options, including surgical options and the use of adjuvant radiation and endocrine therapies,” Dr. Van Zee said. “Women age 80 or older are at low risk of recurrence, even in the absence of adjuvant therapies.”

Recent Videos
Educating community practices on CAR T referral and sequencing treatment strategies may help increase CAR T utilization.
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Although accuracy remains a focus in whole-body MRI testing in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, comfortable testing experiences may ease anxiety.
Subsequent testing among patients in a prospective study may affirm the ability of cfDNA sequencing to detect cancers in those with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
cfDNA sequencing may allow for more accessible, frequent, and sensitive testing compared with standard surveillance in Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
STX-478 showed efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors regardless of whether they had kinase domain or helical PI3K mutations.
STX-478 may avoid adverse effects associated with prior PI3K inhibitors that lack selectivity for the mutated protein vs the wild-type protein.
Phase 1 data may show the possibility of rationally designing agents that can preferentially target PI3K mutations in solid tumors.
Funding a clinical trial to further assess liquid biopsy in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome may help with detecting cancers early across the board.
Related Content