Combined Lenalidomide/Rituximab Active in Recurrent Follicular Lymphoma

News
Article

Combined treatment with lenalidomide/rituximab resulted in better clinical response in patients with recurrent follicular lymphoma than did lenalidomide alone.

Micrograph showing a small B-cell lymphoma compatible with follicular lymphoma. Copyright © 2014 Nephron.

Combined treatment with lenalidomide and rituximab resulted in better clinical response in patients with recurrent follicular lymphoma than did treatment with lenalidomide alone, according to the results of a study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

“Our group believes that the results from CALGB (Alliance) 50401 provide sufficient safety and efficacy data to support the use of lenalidomide/rituximab as a backbone to move toward combination biologic triplet therapy as we explore our next generation of chemotherapy-free regimens in indolent and other lymphomas,” wrote John P. Leonard, MD, of Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, and colleagues.

The monoclonal antibody rituximab is currently approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. According to the study, patients often initially respond but later relapse. Research has also explored the use of other drugs in combination with rituximab as a treatment method for patients who experience relapse.

In this phase II study, the researchers explored the use of rituximab in combination with the immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide. The trial initially assigned patients to rituximab alone, lenalidomide alone (n = 45), or combined rituximab/lenalidomide (n = 46); however, the rituximab alone arm was discontinued due to poor accrual.

Overall, study results showed that combined treatment with lenalidomide/rituximab had good clinical activity in patients with recurrent follicular lymphoma. Thirty-six percent of patients assigned lenalidomide and 63% of patients assigned the combination were able to complete 12 cycles of treatment.

The overall response rate was significantly higher for patients receiving lenalidomide/rituximab compared with lenalidomide alone (76% vs 53%; P = .029). Patients assigned lenalidomide/rituximab had a median time to progression of 2 years compared with 1.1 years for patients assigned lenalidomide alone (P = .0023).

Overall, patients assigned to both arms experienced similar toxicity; however, 22% of patients assigned lenalidomide discontinued therapy as a result of adverse events.

Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 58% of patients assigned lenalidomide and 53% of patients assigned to the combination. These adverse events included neutropenia (16% on lenalidomide vs 20% of the combination), fatigue (9% vs 13%), and thrombosis (16% vs 4%).

“Interestingly, there was a trend toward less thrombosis in the lenalidomide/rituximab arm, which we speculate may be a result of better lymphoma control, reducing venous obstruction and other risks for clot,” the researchers wrote. “It is important to stress that the heterogeneous nature of the patient population with respect to thrombosis risk (and associated use of aspirin and anticoagulants as prophylaxis) makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of ancillary care measures in preventing this complication.”

Recent Videos
Preliminary phase 2 trial data show durvalumab plus lenalidomide was superior to durvalumab alone in refractory/advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Developing odronextamab combinations following CAR T-cell therapy failure may help elicit responses in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Investigators are currently evaluating mosunetuzumab in relapsed disease or comparing it with rituximab in treatment-naïve follicular lymphoma.
Greater direct access to academic oncologists may help address challenges associated with a lack of CAR T education in the community setting.
Certain bridging therapies and abundant steroid use may complicate the T-cell collection process during CAR T therapy.
Educating community practices on CAR T referral and sequencing treatment strategies may help increase CAR T utilization.
Related Content