Defining Clinical Endpoints in Renal Cell Carcinoma

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 20 No 6
Volume 20
Issue 6

The manuscripts that comprise this supplement "Defining Clinical Endpoints in Renal Cell Carcinoma" are presented by six leading international clinical and basic investigators, and are derived from their presentations at the roundtable discussion, "Defining Clinical Endpoints in Renal Cell Carcinoma," which took place in Chicago on October 21, 2005, sponsored by Bayer HealthCare.

The manuscripts that comprise this supplement "Defining Clinical Endpoints in Renal Cell Carcinoma" are presented by six leading international clinical and basic investigators, and are derived from their presentations at the roundtable discussion, "Defining Clinical Endpoints in Renal Cell Carcinoma," which took place in Chicago on October 21, 2005, sponsored by Bayer HealthCare. It was given in conjunction with the Fourth International Kidney Cancer Symposium, and featured educational colloquia in lectures, case study presentations, and panel discussions that covered statistical hierarchy in clinical trial endpoints; historic data and endpoints for targeted therapy in various tumor types; clinical trial data with targeted agents and surrogate endpoints in renal cell carcinoma; and treatment in the community.

The faculty presented information on clinical trends and the design of future trials with historic, current, and promising regimens in renal cell carcinoma. Moreover, they proposed a surrogate endpoint (eg, progression-free survival) and tool for early response evaluation based on biologic efficacy (eg, tumor shrinkage). Finally, an additional goal was to produce enduring material for investigators to aid them in current and future study.

The material contained in this volume is thus intended to be a thorough, objective, balanced presentation of clinically oriented research in renal cell carcinoma. I hope that you, the reader, find the information to be timely, pertinent, and useful in patient management in both the community and trial setting, as well as in the design of future clinical trials.

-Ronald M. Bukowski, MD

Disclosures:

Dr. Bukowski acknowledges research funding, consultant/advisory role, and membership on a speaker's bureau for Bayer, Genentech, and Pfizer.

Recent Videos
An “avalanche of funding” has propelled the kidney cancer field forward, says Jason Muhitch, PhD.
Kidney cancer advocacy efforts have spread the urgency and importance of funding research in the field to members of Congress.
Advocacy efforts have yielded a dramatic increase in kidney cancer research, according to Elizabeth P. Henske, MD.
A review of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma shows radiological tumor burden as an independent prognostic factor for survival.
A phase 2 trial is assessing ubamatamab in patients with MUC16-expressing SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma and epithelioid sarcoma.
Analysis of 2 phase 1 trials compared gut biome diversity between standard of care with or without CBM588 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Related Content