Defining Goals of Therapy in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Commentary
Video

Jorge E. Cortes, MD, emphasizes proper communication between patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and their providers during the treatment course.

CancerNetwork® spoke with Jorge E. Cortes, MD at the 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting about how patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) can dictate the goals of therapy for themselves. He also touched upon other critical factors patients and providers alike should consider during treatment.

Although physicians should aim to guide patients on treatment decision-making, Cortes, director of the Georgia Cancer Center at August University, stated that it is ultimately up to the patients to determine what the therapy course should entail regarding factors such as quality of life. Above all else, Cortes emphasized how patients and providers should consistently communicate with each other to ensure that the former is undergoing proper treatment. He suggested that this flow of communication should also extend to conversations between visits so that providers are informed on any issues related to quality of life or toxicity.

Transcript:

One important thing is that the goals of therapy and the assessment of the quality-of-life impact are [the patient’s]. It’s not the physician’s; our role [as physicians] is to guide where the patient’s goals are. [The goals] are [designed] for them [and their quality of life].

There are [adverse] effects that I can quantitate because there are tests. [For example,] how much the elevation of the liver transaminase is. A lot of these are dependent on the patient. [Patients should] always make sure that [they] communicate properly with [their provider] and always express everything that [they’re] feeling. Certainly, not everything that happens is from the disease or the treatment, but at least bring it up and make sure that [they] have a constant flow of communication even between visits to make sure that if something happens, [their] doctor knows and is able to help [them] and not wait until the next visit in 3 or 6 months.

Recent Videos
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Patients who face smoking stigma, perceive a lack of insurance, or have other low-dose CT related concerns may benefit from blood testing for lung cancer.
Establishment of an AYA Lymphoma Consortium has facilitated a process to better understand and address gaps in knowledge for this patient group.
Adult and pediatric oncology collaboration in assessing nivolumab in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma facilitated the phase 3 SWOG S1826 findings.
Treatment paradigms differ between adult and pediatric oncologists when treating young adults with lymphoma.
Differences in pancreatic cancer responses to treatment elicits a need to better educate patients on expectations in treatment, particularly chemotherapy.
Increasing patient awareness of modifiable risk factors for pancreatic cancer may help mitigate incidence of pancreatic cancers.
It may be crucial to test every patient for markers such as BRAF V600E mutations, NRG1 fusions, and KRAS G12C mutations to help manage pancreatic cancers.
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, emphasizes the idea of moving targeted therapies to earlier lines of treatment to further improve outcomes in pancreatic cancer.
Related Content