The Greatest Need in NET Research is Funding

News
Video

Anna Greene, PhD, spoke about how this under-studied disease needs increased funding and more awareness.

Neuroendocrine cancer, which includes neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), is a complex and often overlooked group of cancers. Often, NETs can be hard to diagnose, leading to increased wait times for treatment. Anna Greene, PhD, director of research at the Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Foundation (NETRF), spoke with CancerNetwork® about the work being done in this field.

Greene specifically focuses on the vital role of funding in advancing neuroendocrine cancer research. Currently, neuroendocrine cancer receives significantly less funding compared with more well-known cancers like lung and prostate cancer. This disparity creates a substantial hurdle regarding research for treatments and a potential cure. While the NETRF is committed to strategic funding of research projects, the field also needs increased financial support to truly accelerate progress.

While funding is important, Greene highlights the importance of cultivating a dedicated community of NET cancer researchers. The NETRF offers awards to emerging talent through initiatives like the Mentored Research Award and travel grants to the annual research symposium. By fostering the growth of this specialized workforce, the NETRF aims to build a strong foundation for future breakthroughs in NET research.

Transcript:

Funding. We need more funding. Most disease states would say that they need more funding. We believe that’s the case as well. We did a survey of our community last year and asked them what the greatest need was, and by far, they all responded with more funding. When you think about more commonly known cancers like lung cancer or prostate cancer, these cancer types receive hundreds of millions of dollars in funding per year, and we’re funding NET cancer research at about a $2 million level right now. We hope to increase that, but there’s a huge gap there in NET cancer funding vs these more commonly known cancers. We try to be strategic with the projects we fund, but it’s hard to compete with hundreds of millions of dollars in funding. We’re doing what we can to improve treatments and work toward a cure with our funding level, but we need more funding dedicated to NET cancer research.

Secondary to that is [we need] more NET cancer researchers. We want people who are dedicated to this disease type, who want to work in this [field] and they need funding. We try to do that through our mentored research award by bringing people into the field. We hope that they will be dedicated and join our cause. That’s another area where we’re working is to try to build that pipeline of NET cancer researchers. Another thing we’re trying to do is provide travel grants to our annual research symposium. We’re excited that we have dedicated funding for this year to bring in at least 10 early-career investigators to attend our symposium for little or no cost. That’s another way we’re trying to bring people into the field. We’re excited to have that happen.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Extravasation with beta emitters may elicit more drastic adverse effects due to their higher radiation dose.
Increasing the use of patient-reported outcomes may ensure that practitioners can fully ascertain the impact of treatment for rare lymphomas.
Photographic and written documentation can help providers recognize inflammatory breast cancer symptoms across diverse populations.
The use of guideline-concordant care in breast cancer appears to be more common in White populations than Black populations.
Retrospective and real-world registry studies may be necessary to guide clinical decision-making for rarer lymphomas with insufficient prospective data.
Extravasation results in exposing healthy tissue to radiation, which can be highly dosed depending on the isotope used for treatment.
Ongoing studies seek to evaluate immunotherapy in earlier lines of therapy for patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma.
Strict inclusion criteria may disproportionately exclude racial minority populations from participating in breast cancer trials.
A paucity of prospective, well-vetted data to guide therapy in patients with rare lymphomas may result in a reliance on expert consensus guidelines.
Related Content