Disparities in Suicide Risk Following Cancer Diagnosis Identified

Article

Suicide risk increased among patients who had a lower-income and lived in rural counties following a cancer diagnosis.

Following a cancer diagnosis, patients’ income level and rural or urban living status may have a negative impact on psychological health leading to suicide, with investigators highlighting the need for further research and accessible mental health services in order to address these disparities, according to a study published in JAMA Network Open.

Investigators determined that patients living in the lowest income counties had the highest risk of suicide (standard mortality ratio [SMR] 1.94; 95% CI, 1.76-2.13) compared with those living in the highest-income counties (SMR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.26-1.34). Additionally, patients living in rural areas had a higher risk of suicide (SMR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.70-1.92) compared with urban areas (SMR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.32-1.39). After 10 or more years following a cancer diagnosis, patients in the lowest-income counties remained at risk (SMR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.31-2.48).

Data pulled from the SEER databased included a total of 5,362,782 patients diagnosed with cancer living in 635 counties. Most patients in this study were men (51.2%) and White (72.2%), with almost half being older than 65 years of age (49.7%). The majority of patients resided within the highest-income counties (75.9%), 5.6% of patients were from the lowest income counties, 87.4% were from urban areas, and 12.6% were from rural counties. During follow-up, 6357 patients died from suicide, with 71.1% coming from the highest-income counties, and 84.3% from urban counties.

Although investigators reported that those who were 65 years of age or older had the largest disparities across county level factors (first quartile SMR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.93-2.49; fourth quartile SMR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.37-1.49), disparities were similar across age groups. Additionally, larger disparities in county level income were observed in men (first quartile: SMR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.89-2.31 vs fourth quartile: SMR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.28-1.36) vs women (first quartile: SMR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.05-1.82 vs fourth quartile: SMR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14-1.31).

White patients who resided within lower-income counties had a higher SMR (SMR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.82-2.21) compared with the highest-income counties (SMR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.37-1.46). Investigators also reported that Asian/Pacific Islander patients who were living in the highest-income counties had a 2-fold increase in suicide compared with those living in the lowest-income counties. Hispanic patients diagnosed with cancer living in the lowest income countries did not appear to have a significant increase in suicide (first quartile: SMR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.69-2.11), and those in the highest-income counties had a significantly lower risk of suicide (fourth quartile: SMR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.55-0.71) compared with the general population.

The highest risk of suicide regardless of income or living status was within 1 year of diagnosis. After 10 years, patients in the highest-income counties or rural/urban status did not have an increased risk of death.

From 2000 to 2010, patients in the lowest-income counties had an SMR decline (annual percentage change [APC], −5.90%; 95% CI, −12.92% to −0.31%), and plateaued from 2010 to 2015 (APC, 4.80%; 95% CI, −19.97% to 37.24%). Those in the highest-income counties had an SMR decline from 2000 to 2005 (APC, −8.31%; 95% CI, −15.75% to −0.21%), and there was no significant change from 2005 to 2015 (APC, 2.03%; 95% CI, −0.97% to 5.13%). Those in rural counties had a decrease of SMR from 2000 to 2004 (APC, −15.48%; 95% CI, −28.45% to −0.17%), then a plateau from 2004 to 2015 (APC, 1.83%; 95% CI, −1.98% to 5.79%). Patients in urban counties did not have a significant SMR change between 2000 to 2015 (APC, −0.59%; 95% CI, −2.20% to 1.05%).

Suicide rates were higher for patients diagnosed in counties with less education, higher unemployment rates, and more Black residents. Patients in rural counties had a higher suicide risk, but only in those with the highest-income quartile compared with urban counties (SMR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.35-1.84 vs 1.29; 95% CI, 1.25-1.33). The highest suicide risk was found in counties with the lowest-income quartile and that had more than 50% Black residents (SMR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.84-3.25). Rural counties that had more than 50% of Black residents also had the highest suicide rate (SMR, 3.51; 95% CI, 2.12-5.49).

Reference

Suk R, Hong YR, Wasserman RM, et al. Analysis of suicide after cancer diagnosis by US county-level income and rural vs urban designation, 2000-2016. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(10):e2129913. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.29913

Recent Videos
STX-478 showed efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors regardless of whether they had kinase domain or helical PI3K mutations.
STX-478 may avoid adverse effects associated with prior PI3K inhibitors that lack selectivity for the mutated protein vs the wild-type protein.
Phase 1 data may show the possibility of rationally designing agents that can preferentially target PI3K mutations in solid tumors.
Funding a clinical trial to further assess liquid biopsy in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome may help with detecting cancers early across the board.
Michael J. Hall, MD, MS, FASCO, discusses the need to reduce barriers to care for those with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, including those who live in rural areas.
The ability of metformin to disrupt mitochondrial metabolism may help mitigate the risk of cancer in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
It can be hard to get exposure for a new field, but Jessica Cheng, MD, has big plans on how to advance the field of cancer rehabilitation.
Anyone undergoing cancer treatments could benefit from cancer rehabilitation, according to Jessica Cheng, MD.
Jessica Cheng, MD, noted that working with patients in the field of cancer rehabilitation to improve recovery times brings her joy.
Related Content