Ethnic, Racial, and Sex Diversity Needed in Breast Cancer Clinical Trials

Commentary
Video

While the majority of patients with breast cancer are women, men need to be considered when designing clinical trials.

A lack of diversity in breast cancer clinical trial enrollment, whether it be lacking racially diverse populations or not including male patients, may prove detrimental to survival outcomes and when selecting therapies for select patient subgroups, according to Paolo Tarantino, MD.

Specifically, he noted that including diverse populations is important to fully understand how drugs benefit different patient groups. Tarantino, a medical oncologist at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, noted his desire to see novel therapy indications expanded among these groups. Additionally, he indicated that this should become a more standard of practice over the next few years.

Transcript:

We’re learning more and more that breast cancer can differ biologically in patients of different races, and ethnic origins. In general, it’s important to focus our attention and research efforts on these topics and ensure that trials can enroll a diverse population so that we can understand [if] there is a difference in the drugs’ benefit depending on these factors [via sub-analysis]. This is happening but, of course, it takes time. At Dana-Farber, we’re active in trying to develop trials that enroll in diverse areas. Whenever we design a trial, there are [trial] sites that are able to reach populations that we’re not able to reach in Boston. I do expect this to improve in the next few years and to be able [to conduct trials that] are powered to understand if certain drugs are interactive in different ethnic populations or races.

It's important to remember that 99% of breast cancers occur in women, but about 1% occur in men, and we don’t have enough data on these novel drugs in men; we do need those data. Men should always be allowed to enroll in these trials so that we can perform sub-analyses and understand if novel drugs are as active in women [as they are] in men who biologically also have different cancers and can also have poorer prognoses compared with women. It’s important to focus on all these diversities and to tackle them in the way we design clinical trials and the way we analyze the resulting data.

Recent Videos
The FirstLook liquid biopsy, when used as an adjunct to low-dose CT, may help to address the unmet need of low lung cancer screening utilization.
An 80% sensitivity for lung cancer was observed with the liquid biopsy, with high sensitivity observed for early-stage disease, as well.
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Patients who face smoking stigma, perceive a lack of insurance, or have other low-dose CT related concerns may benefit from blood testing for lung cancer.
Establishment of an AYA Lymphoma Consortium has facilitated a process to better understand and address gaps in knowledge for this patient group.
Adult and pediatric oncology collaboration in assessing nivolumab in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma facilitated the phase 3 SWOG S1826 findings.
Treatment paradigms differ between adult and pediatric oncologists when treating young adults with lymphoma.
Differences in pancreatic cancer responses to treatment elicits a need to better educate patients on expectations in treatment, particularly chemotherapy.
Increasing patient awareness of modifiable risk factors for pancreatic cancer may help mitigate incidence of pancreatic cancers.
It may be crucial to test every patient for markers such as BRAF V600E mutations, NRG1 fusions, and KRAS G12C mutations to help manage pancreatic cancers.